This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Reprints and Permissions Copyright Information Books from ASM Press MicrobeWorld Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Herman, R. K. Articles by Dworkin, N. B. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Herman, R. K. Articles by Dworkin, N. B.

Effect of Gene Induction on the Rate of Mutagenesis by ICR-191 in Escherichia coli

¹ Department of Genetics and Cell Biólogy, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, Minnesota 55101

ABSTRACT

ICR-191, an acridine half-mustard known to cause frameshift mutations in bacteria, was used to induce Lac^– mutations revertible by ICR-191. The reversion rates of several of these mutations were stimulated approximately twofold by the presence of lac inducer. The stimulatory effect of inducer was attributable to gene induction rather than some other effect of inducer, since inducer did not stimulate reversion in a regulator constitutive strain. The stimulatory effect was not observed unless the gene to be reverted was induced during the period of exposure to ICR-191. The presence of a strong polar (nonsense) mutation on the operator side of a frameshift mutation abolished the stimulatory effect of inducer on reversion of the frameshift mutation by ICR-191. (As expected, a nonpolar mutation on the operator side of the frameshift mutation did not affect inducer-stimulated reversion.) It was concluded that some aspect of transcription or translation, or both, in the neighborhood of the ICR-191-induced mutation stimulated reversion by ICR-191. A recA mutation had no effect on reversion by ICR-191 in the presence or absence of inducer. In one mutant, gene induction depressed reversion by ICR-191 about sevenfold. The difference between this exceptional strain and other mutants was not attributable to different genetic backgrounds but seemed to be an inherent difference in the original Lac^– mutations.

This article has been cited by other articles:

• Burkala, E., Reimers, J. M., Schmidt, K. H., Davis, N., Wei, P., Wright, B. E. (2007). Secondary structures as predictors of mutation potential in the lacZ gene of Escherichia coli. Microbiology 153: 2180-2189 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Li, X., Manley, J. L. (2006). Cotranscriptional processes and their influence on genome stability. Genes Dev. 20: 1838-1847 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Garcia-Rubio, M., Huertas, P., Gonzalez-Barrera, S., Aguilera, A. (2003). Recombinogenic Effects of DNA-Damaging Agents Are Synergistically Increased by Transcription in Saccharomyces cerevisiae: New Insights Into Transcription-Associated Recombination. Genetics 165: 457-466 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Rattray, A. J., Shafer, B. K., McGill, C. B., Strathern, J. N. (2002). The Roles of REV3 and RAD57 in Double-Strand-Break-Repair-Induced Mutagenesis of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 162: 1063-1077 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Wright, B. E. (2000). A Biochemical Mechanism for Nonrandom Mutations and Evolution. J. Bacteriol. 182: 2993-3001 [Full Text]  
• LONGACRE, A., REIMERS, J. M., WRIGHT, B. E. (1999). Specificity of Transcription-Enhanced Mutations. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 870: 383-385 [Full Text]  
• RUDNER, R., MURRAY, A., HUDA, N. (1999). Is There a Link between Mutation Rates and the Stringent Response in Bacillus subtilis?. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 870: 418-422 [Full Text]  
• Wright, B. E., Longacre, A., Reimers, J. M. (1999). Hypermutation in derepressed operons of Escherichia coli K12. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 96: 5089-5094 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Datta, A, Jinks-Robertson, S (1995). Association of increased spontaneous mutation rates with high levels of transcription in yeast. Science 268: 1616-1619 [Abstract]