JB
Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Reddy, C. A.
Right arrow Articles by Wolin, M. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Reddy, C. A.
Right arrow Articles by Wolin, M. J.
J Bacteriol. 1972 February; 109(2): 539-545
Copyright © 1972 American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Characteristics of S Organism Isolated from Methanobacillus omelianskii1

C. Adinarayana Reddy2, M. P. Bryant and M. J. Wolin

a Departments of Dairy Science and Microbiology, University of Illinois, Urbana, Illinois 61803

ABSTRACT

Previous work showed that Methanobacillus omelianskii was a mixed culture of an ethanol-oxidizing organism called S organism and a hydrogen-utilizing methane bacterium, strain MOH. S organism grows poorly on ethanol unless a hydrogen-utilizing methanogenic bacterium is included to utilize the H2 produced during growth. Further studies have shown that, among many substrates tested, only ethanol, n-propanol, n-butanol, isobutanol, n-pentanol, acetaldehyde, oxalacetate, and pyruvate are fermented by S organism, either alone or in combination with Methanobacterium ruminantium. It grew better in pure culture with pyruvate than with alcohols. H2 gas phase inhibited growth on pyruvate as well as on alcohol. When grown alone on pyruvate, S organism produced mainly acetate, ethanol, and CO2, in addition to a small amount of H2. When combined with M. ruminantium, no H2 and very little ethanol were produced and acetate production was increased. When M. ruminantium was present, electrons from pyruvate oxidation by S organism were channeled almost entirely to H2 and hence to methane formation rather than ethanol. Also, S organism utilized more pyruvate when grown with M. ruminantium. Attempts to obtain better growth of S organism on ethanol by addition of many possible electron acceptors were unsuccessful. It grew best between 32 and 45 C, had a per cent guanine plus cytosine content of deoxyribonucleic acid bases of 47.27 ± 0.1, contained no cytochrome, and could be grown on a defined medium with pyruvate as the energy and carbon source and with (NH4)2SO4 as the main nitrogen source. These and other results suggest that S organism belongs in a new genus, but assignment of a definite taxonomic status should await isolation and characterization of more strains.


FOOTNOTES

2 Present address: Department of Biochemistry, University of Georgia, Athens, Ga. 30601.

1 This work was presented in part at the 69th Annual Meeting of the American Society for Microbiology, Miami, Fla., 4–9 May 1969.


J Bacteriol. 1972 February; 109(2): 539-545
Copyright © 1972 American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.




This article has been cited by other articles:




Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
Appl. Environ. Microbiol. Infect. Immun. Eukaryot. Cell
Mol. Cell. Biol. J. Virol. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev.
ALL ASM JOURNALS

Copyright © 1972 by the American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.