JB
Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Nakayama, H.
Right arrow Articles by Hayashi, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Nakayama, H.
Right arrow Articles by Hayashi, R.
J Bacteriol. 1972 December; 112(3): 1118-1126
Copyright © 1972 American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Biosynthetic Pathway of Thiamine Pyrophosphate: a Special Reference to the Thiamine Monophosphate-Requiring Mutant and the Thiamine Pyrophosphate-Requiring Mutant of Escherichia coli

Hideo Nakayama and Ryoji Hayashi

Department of Microbiology, Yamaguchi University School of Medicine, Ube, Yamaguchi-Ken, Japan

ABSTRACT

Two types of mutants of Escherichia coli were isolated, one of which (mutant 70-23-107) responded to thiamine pyrophosphate, and the other (mutant 70-23-102) to thiamine monophosphate and thiamine pyrophosphate. They were produced by further mutation of a thiamine auxotroph of E. coli 70-23 with N-methyl-N'-nitro-N-nitrosoguanidine. The parent organism required thiamine because phosphohydroxymethylpyrimidine kinase activity was lacking in this organism, and hydroxymethylpyrimidine pyrophosphate was not permeable through the cell membrane of E. coli. Thiamine, thiamine monophosphate, and thiamine pyrophosphate were all equally active for the parent, whereas mutants 70-23-102 and 70-23-107 lost their ability to grow on thiamine. Both mutants differed only in the growth response to thiamine monophosphate: the former could grow on thiamine monophosphate, whereas the latter could not. Experimental results with the newly isolated mutants indicate that in E. coli the free form of thiamine is not involved in de novo synthesis of thiamine pyrophosphate, but thiamine monophosphate, an exclusive product formed by the reaction between hydroxymethylpyrimidine pyrophosphate and hydroxyethylthiazole monophosphate, is directly phosphorylated to form thiamine pyrophosphate. Exogenous thiamine, on the other hand, is converted to thiamine pyrophosphate via the intermediate formation of thiamine monophosphate.


J Bacteriol. 1972 December; 112(3): 1118-1126
Copyright © 1972 American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.




This article has been cited by other articles:




Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
Appl. Environ. Microbiol. Infect. Immun. Eukaryot. Cell
Mol. Cell. Biol. J. Virol. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev.
ALL ASM JOURNALS

Copyright © 1972 by the American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.