JB Try AEM Online
Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Coyne, S. I.
Right arrow Articles by Mendelson, N. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Coyne, S. I.
Right arrow Articles by Mendelson, N. H.
J Bacteriol. 1974 April; 118(1): 15-20
Copyright © 1974 American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Clonal Analysis of Cell Division in the Bacillus subtilis div IV-B1 Minicell-Producing Mutant

Sheila I. Coyne and Neil H. Mendelson

1 Department of Microbiology and Medical Technology, and Graduate Committee on Genetics, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona 85721

ABSTRACT

Spores of the Bacillus subtilis minicell-producing mutant div IV-B1 were germinated and grown to microcolonies in chambers which facilitate continuous observation of the developing clones with a phase-contrast microscope. Time lapse photographs were taken of 46 clones, covering the period from the beginning of outgrowth until at least two rounds of cell division had been completed. Cell lineages were constructed from contour length measurements of the photographs. These data include cell lengths, division site locations, and cell numbers in clones of various ages. From these data we have determined that the probability of a minicell being produced at any division by the div IV-B1 mutant is 0.31. The location of the abnormal division site which generates the first minicell produced in the outgrowing clone appears to be random with respect to the existing cell poles. In contrast, the location of the second abnormal division site, and hence the second minicell, is not random but rather occurs preferentially in proximity to the first minicell. This clustering of abnormal events suggests that division site location is related to pole age (generations), although other influences on minicell clustering cannot be ruled out at present.


J Bacteriol. 1974 April; 118(1): 15-20
Copyright © 1974 American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.




This article has been cited by other articles:




Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
Appl. Environ. Microbiol. Infect. Immun. Eukaryot. Cell
Mol. Cell. Biol. J. Virol. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev.
ALL ASM JOURNALS

Copyright © 1974 by the American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.