JB
Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Curiale, M S
Right arrow Articles by Mills, D
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Curiale, M S
Right arrow Articles by Mills, D

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

J Bacteriol. 1976 May; 126(2): 661-667

Ribonucleic acid synthesized in meiotic cells of Saccharomyces cerevisiae: effect of culture medium pH.

M S Curiale, M M Petryna and D Mills

ABSTRACT

Pulse-labeled ribonucleic acid (RNA) was extracted from polysomes of sporulating cells of Saccharomyces cerevisiae and characterized in sucrose gradients and by sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. Transfer RNA, ribosomal RNA, and heterodisperse RNA, presumed to be messenger RNA, were synthesized during a 20-min pulse at T4 and T6 when labeling was performed in sporulation medium adjusted to pH 6.0. Furthermore, ribosomal RNA was processed into functional ribosomes during the pulse. The specific activity of pulse-labeled RNA of cells labeled in sporulation medium where the pH was unadjusted at T4 (pH 7.8) and T9 (pH 8.6) was 20- to 50-fold lower than RNA from cells labeled at pH 6.0. The low specific activity resulted from a 50-fold reduction in uptake of labeled precursors when the medium pH was greater than 7.2. However, heterodisperse RNA ranging from 4-17S in size and transfer RNA were synthesized during the pulse at T4 (pH 7.8),but the low specific activity of ribosomal RNA prevented a thorough analysis of its synthesis. Cellular impermeability at T9 (pH 8.6) resulted in minimal uptake of label, and an analysis of pulse-labeled transcripts was impossible. A comparison of the percantage of polysomal material indicate, however, that these cells were at least as active in translation as cells pulse-labeled at pH 6.0.


J Bacteriol. 1976 May; 126(2): 661-667







Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
Appl. Environ. Microbiol. Infect. Immun. Eukaryot. Cell
Mol. Cell. Biol. J. Virol. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev.
ALL ASM JOURNALS

Copyright © 1976 by the American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.