JB
Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Woolfolk, C A
Right arrow Articles by Downard, J S
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Woolfolk, C A
Right arrow Articles by Downard, J S

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

J Bacteriol. 1977 June; 130(3): 1175-1191

Distribution of xanthine oxidase and xanthine dehydrogenase specificity types among bacteria.

C A Woolfolk and J S Downard

ABSTRACT

A diverse collection of xanthine-metabolizing bacteria was examined for xanthine-, 1-methylxanthine-, and 3-methylxanthine-oxidizing activity. Both particulate and soluble fractions of extracts from aerobically grown gram-negative bacteria exhibited oxidation of all three substrates; however, when facultative gram-negative bacteria were grown anaerobically, low particulate and 3-methylxanthine activities were detected. Gram-positive and obligately anaerobic bacteria showed no particulate activity or 3-methylxanthine oxidation. Substrate specificity studies indicate two types of enzyme distributed among the bacteria along taxonomic lines, although other features indicate diversity of the enzyme within these two major groups. The soluble and particulate enzymes from Pseudomonas putida and the enzyme from Arthrobacter S-2 were examined as type examples with a series of purine and analogues differing in the number and position of oxygen groups. Each preparation was active with a variety of compounds, but the compounds and position attacked by each enzyme was different, both from the other enzymes examined and from previously investigated enzymes. The soluble enzyme from Pseudomonas was inhibited in a competitive manner by uric acid, whereas the Arthrobacter enzyme was not. This was correlated with the ability of Pseudomonas, but not Arthrobacter, to incorporate radioactivity from [2-14C]uric acid into cellular material.


J Bacteriol. 1977 June; 130(3): 1175-1191




This article has been cited by other articles:




Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
Appl. Environ. Microbiol. Infect. Immun. Eukaryot. Cell
Mol. Cell. Biol. J. Virol. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev.
ALL ASM JOURNALS

Copyright © 1977 by the American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.