JB
Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Silver, S
Right arrow Articles by Rosenberg, H
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Silver, S
Right arrow Articles by Rosenberg, H

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

J Bacteriol. 1981 June; 146(3): 983-996

Inducible plasmid-determined resistance to arsenate, arsenite, and antimony (III) in escherichia coli and Staphylococcus aureus.

S Silver, K Budd, K M Leahy, W V Shaw, D Hammond, R P Novick, G R Willsky, M H Malamy and H Rosenberg

ABSTRACT

Plasmids in both Escherichia coli and Staphylococcus aureus contain an "operon" that confers resistance to arsenate, arsenite, and antimony(III) salts. The systems were always inducible. All three salts, arsenate, arsenite, and antimony(III), were inducers. Mutants and a cloned deoxyribonucleic acid fragment from plasmid pI258 in S. aureus have lost arsenate resistance but retained resistances to arsenite and antimony, demonstrating that separate genes are involved. Arsenate-resistant arsenite-sensitive S. aureus plasmid mutants were also isolated. In E. coli, plasmid-determined arsenate resistance and reduced uptake were additive to that found with chromosomal arsenate resistance mutants. Arsenate resistance was due to reduced uptake of arsenate by the induced plasmid-containing cells. Under conditions of high arsenate, when some uptake could be demonstrated with the induced resistant cells, the arsenate was rapidly lost by the cells in the absence of extracellular phosphate. Sensitive cells retained arsenate under these conditions. When phosphate was added, phosphate-arsenate exchange occurred. High phosphate in the growth medium protected cells from arsenate, but not from arsenite or antimony(III) toxicity. We do not know the mechanisms of arsenite or antimony resistance. However, arsenite was not oxidized to less toxic arsenate. Since cell-free medium "conditioned" by prior growth to induced resistant cells with toxic levels of arsenite or antimony(III) retained the ability to inhibit the growth of sensitive cells, the mechanism of arsenite and antimony resistance does not involve conversion of AsO2- or SbO+ to less toxic forms or binding by soluble thiols excreted by resistant cells.


J Bacteriol. 1981 June; 146(3): 983-996




This article has been cited by other articles:




Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
Appl. Environ. Microbiol. Infect. Immun. Eukaryot. Cell
Mol. Cell. Biol. J. Virol. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev.
ALL ASM JOURNALS

Copyright © 1981 by the American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.