JB
Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Friedrich, C G
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Friedrich, C G

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

J Bacteriol. 1982 January; 149(1): 203-210

Depression of hydrogenase during limitation of electron donors and derepression of ribulosebisphosphate carboxylase during carbon limitation of Alcaligenes eutrophus.

C G Friedrich

ABSTRACT

Alcaligenes eutrophus did not form the key enzymes of autotrophic metabolism, the soluble and particulate hydrogenases and ribulosebisphosphate carboxylase (RuBPC), during heterotrophic growth on succinate in batch cultures. During succinate-limited growth in a chemostat, high activities of both hydrogenases were observed. With decreasing dilution rate (D) the steady-state hydrogenase activity (H) followed first-order kinetics, expressed as follows: H = Hmax .e-alpha.D. An identical correlation was observed when autotrophic growth in a chemostat was limited by molecular hydrogen. During autotrophic growth under oxygen or carbon dioxide limitation, the activity if the soluble hydrogenase was low. These data suggested that hydrogenase formation depended on the availability of reducing equivalents to the cells. RuBPC activities were not correlated with the hydrogenase activities. During succinate-limited growth, RuBPC appeared at intermediate activities. During autotrophic growth in a carbon dioxide-limited chemostat, RuBPC was highly derepressed. RuBPC activity was not detected in cells that suffered from energy limitation with a surplus of carbon, as in a heterotrophic oxygen-limited chemostat, nor was it detected in cells limited in carbon and energy, as in the case of complete exhaustion of a heterotrophic substrate. From these data I concluded that RuBPC formation in A. eutrophus depends on two conditions, namely, carbon starvation and an excess of reducing equivalents.


J Bacteriol. 1982 January; 149(1): 203-210




This article has been cited by other articles:




Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
Appl. Environ. Microbiol. Infect. Immun. Eukaryot. Cell
Mol. Cell. Biol. J. Virol. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev.
ALL ASM JOURNALS

Copyright © 1982 by the American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.