This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Copyright Information Books from ASM Press MicrobeWorld Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Parke, D Articles by Ornston, L N Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Parke, D Articles by Ornston, L N

Chemotaxis to aromatic and hydroaromatic acids: comparison of Bradyrhizobium japonicum and Rhizobium trifolii.

ABSTRACT

Rhizobia are bacteria well known for their ability to fix nitrogen in symbiosis with leguminous plants. Members of diverse rhizobial species grow at the expense of hydroaromatic and aromatic compounds commonly found in plant cells and plant litter. Using a quantitative capillary assay to measure chemotaxis, we tested the ability of hydroaromatic acids, selected aromatic acids, and their metabolites to serve as chemoattractants for two distantly related rhizobial species, Bradyrhizobium japonicum and Rhizobium trifolii. Slow-growing B. japonicum I-110 demonstrated positive chemotaxis to shikimate, quinate, protocatechuate, and vanillate; threshold concentrations for the compounds were as low as 10(-6) M. The dicarboxylic acids succinate and beta-ketoadipate, metabolites in the catabolism of many aromatic compounds, were positive chemoattractants with low threshold concentrations as well. Taxis to beta-ketoadipate occurred constitutively and, of the tested compounds, beta-ketoadipate gave the strongest peak response. Taxis to shikimate or quinate was induced by growth on either substrate but not by growth on protocatechuate or succinate. In contrast, fast-growing R. trifolii 2066 was only weakly attracted to quinate and other aromatic and dicarboxylic acids that were strong attractants for B. japonicum. The R. trifolii strain exhibited positive chemotaxis to shikimate, but the threshold concentration of shikimate required to elicit a response (10(-4) M) was 2 orders of magnitude higher than that for the B. japonicum strain.

This article has been cited by other articles:

• Brencic, A., Winans, S. C. (2005). Detection of and Response to Signals Involved in Host-Microbe Interactions by Plant-Associated Bacteria. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 69: 155-194 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Lux, R., Shi, W. (2004). CHEMOTAXIS-GUIDED MOVEMENTS IN BACTERIA. Crit. Rev. Oral Biol. Med. 15: 207-220 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Pandey, G., Jain, R. K. (2002). Bacterial Chemotaxis toward Environmental Pollutants: Role in Bioremediation. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 68: 5789-5795 [Full Text]  
• Parke, D., D'Argenio, D. A., Ornston, L. N. (2000). Bacteria Are Not What They Eat: That Is Why They Are So Diverse. J. Bacteriol. 182: 257-263 [Full Text]  
• D'Argenio, D. A., Segura, A., Coco, W. M., Bünz, P. V., Ornston, L. N. (1999). The Physiological Contribution of Acinetobacter PcaK, a Transport System That Acts upon Protocatechuate, Can Be Masked by the Overlapping Specificity of VanK. J. Bacteriol. 181: 3505-3515 [Abstract] [Full Text]