JB Email Content Delivery
Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Slocum, M K
Right arrow Articles by Parkinson, J S
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Slocum, M K
Right arrow Articles by Parkinson, J S
J Bacteriol. 1985 August; 163(2): 586-594

Genetics of methyl-accepting chemotaxis proteins in Escherichia coli: null phenotypes of the tar and tap genes.

M K Slocum and J S Parkinson

ABSTRACT

The tar and tap genes are located adjacent to one another in an operon of chemotaxis-related functions. They encode methyl-accepting chemotaxis proteins implicated in tactic responses to aspartate and maltose stimuli. The functional roles of these two gene products were investigated by isolating and characterizing nonpolar, single-gene deletion mutants at each locus. Deletions were obtained by selecting for loss or a defective Mu d1 prophage inserted in either the tar or tap gene. The extent of the tar deletions was determined by genetic mapping with Southern hybridization. Representative deletion mutants were surveyed for chemotactic responses on semisolid agar and by temporal stimulation in a tethered cell assay to assess flagellar rotational responses to chemoeffector compounds. The tar deletion strains exhibited complete loss of aspartate and maltose responses, whereas the tap deletion strains displayed a wild-type phenotype under all conditions tested. These findings indicate that the tap function is unable to promote chemotactic responses to aspartate and maltose, and its role in chemotaxis remains unclear.


J Bacteriol. 1985 August; 163(2): 586-594




This article has been cited by other articles:




Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
Appl. Environ. Microbiol. Infect. Immun. Eukaryot. Cell
Mol. Cell. Biol. J. Virol. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev.
ALL ASM JOURNALS

Copyright © 1985 by the American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.