JB MMBR Online 2003
Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kim, U J
Right arrow Articles by Lovett, P S
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kim, U J
Right arrow Articles by Lovett, P S
J Bacteriol. 1988 July; 170(7): 2933-2938

research-article

Site in the cat-86 regulatory leader that permits amicetin to induce expression of the gene.

U J Kim, N P Ambulos Jr, E J Duvall, M A Lorton and P S Lovett

Department of Biological Sciences, University of Maryland Baltimore County, Catonsville 21228.

ABSTRACT

Expression of the plasmid gene cat-86 is induced in Bacillus subtilis by two antibiotics, chloramphenicol and the nucleoside antibiotic amicetin. We proposed that induction by either drug causes the destabilization of a stem-loop structure in cat-86 mRNA that sequesters the ribosome-binding site for the cat coding sequence. The destabilization event frees the ribosome-binding site, permitting the initiation of translation of cat-86 mRNA. cat-86 induction is due to the stalling of a ribosome in a leader region of cat-86 mRNA, which is located 5' to the RNA stem-loop structure. A stalled ribosome that is active in cat-86 induction has its aminoacyl site occupied by leader codon 6. To test the hypothesis that a leader site 5' to codon 6 permits a ribosome to stall in the presence of an inducing antibiotic, we inserted an extra codon between leader codons 5 and 6. This insertion blocked induction, which was then restored by the deletion of leader codon 6. Thus, induction seems to require the maintenance of a precise spatial relationship between an upstream leader site(s) and leader codon 6. Mutations in the ribosome-binding site for the cat-86 leader, RBS-2, which decreased its strength of binding to 16S rRNA, prevented induction. In contrast, mutations that significantly altered the sequence of RBS-2 but increased its strength of binding to 16S rRNA did not block induction by either chloramphenicol or amicetin. We therefore suspected that the proposed leader site that permitted drug-mediated stalling was located between RBS-2 and leader codon 6. This region of the cat-86 leader contains an eight-nucleotide sequence (conserved region I) that is largely conserved among all known cat leaders. The codon immediately 5' to conserved region I differs, however, between amicetin-inducible and amicetin-noninducible cat genes. In amicetin-inducible cat genes such as cat-86, the codon 5' to conserved region I is a valine codon, GTG. The same codon in amicetin-noninducible cat genes is a lysine codon, either AAA or AAG. When the GTG codon immediately 5' to conserved region I in cat-86 was changed to AAA, amicetin was no longer active in cat-86 induction, but chloramphenicol induction was unaffected by the mutation. The potential role of the GTG codon in amicetin induction is discussed.


J Bacteriol. 1988 July; 170(7): 2933-2938







Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
Appl. Environ. Microbiol. Infect. Immun. Eukaryot. Cell
Mol. Cell. Biol. J. Virol. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev.
ALL ASM JOURNALS

Copyright © 1988 by the American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.