JB
Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rogers, E J
Right arrow Articles by Lovett, P S
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Rogers, E J
Right arrow Articles by Lovett, P S

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

J Bacteriol. 1990 January; 172(1): 110-115

research-article

Four codons in the cat-86 leader define a chloramphenicol-sensitive ribosome stall sequence.

E J Rogers, U J Kim, N P Ambulos Jr and P S Lovett

Department of Biological Sciences, University of Maryland Baltimore County, Catonsville 21228.

ABSTRACT

Genes encoding chloramphenicol acetyltransferase in gram-positive bacteria are induced by chloramphenicol. Induction reflects an ability of the drug to stall a ribosome at a specific site in cat leader mRNA. Ribosome stalling at this site alters downstream RNA secondary structure, thereby unmasking the ribosome-binding site for the cat coding sequence. Here, we show that ribosome stalling in the cat-86 leader is a function of leader codons 2 through 5 and that stalling requires these codons to be presented in the correct reading frame. Codons 2 through 5 specify Val-Lys-Thr-Asp. Insertion of a second copy of the stall sequence 5' to the authentic stall sequence diminished cat-86 induction fivefold. Thus, the stall sequence can function in ribosome stalling when the stall sequence is displaced from the downstream RNA secondary structure. We suggest that the stall sequence may function in cat induction at two levels. First, the tetrapeptide specified by the stall sequence likely plays an active role in the induction strategy, on the basis of previously reported genetic suppression studies (W. W. Mulbry, N. P. Ambulos, Jr., and P.S. Lovett, J. Bacteriol. 171:5322-5324, 1989). Second, we show that embedded within the stall sequence of cat leaders is a region which is complementary to a sequence internal in 16S rRNA of Bacillus subtilis. This complementarity may guide a ribosome to the proper position on leader mRNA or potentiate the stalling event, or both. The region of complementarity is absent from Escherichia coli 16S rRNA, and cat genes induce poorly, or not at all, in E. coli.


J Bacteriol. 1990 January; 172(1): 110-115




This article has been cited by other articles:




Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
Appl. Environ. Microbiol. Infect. Immun. Eukaryot. Cell
Mol. Cell. Biol. J. Virol. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev.
ALL ASM JOURNALS

Copyright © 1990 by the American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.