JB
Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hugouvieux-Cotte-Pattat, N
Right arrow Articles by Harayama, S
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hugouvieux-Cotte-Pattat, N
Right arrow Articles by Harayama, S

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

J Bacteriol. 1990 December; 172(12): 6651-6660

research-article

Growth-phase-dependent expression of the Pseudomonas putida TOL plasmid pWW0 catabolic genes.

N Hugouvieux-Cotte-Pattat, T Köhler, M Rekik and S Harayama

Department of Medical Biochemistry, Faculty of Medicine, University of Geneva, Switzerland.

ABSTRACT

Pseudomonas putida TOL plasmid pWW0 catabolic genes are clustered into two operons. The first, the upper operon, is controlled by the xylR regulatory gene, whereas the second, the meta operon, is controlled by the xylS regulatory gene. The xylS gene itself is subjected to control by xylR. In this study, we show that the TOL catabolic operons were poorly induced in cells growing at the early-exponential-growth phase but strongly induced in cells at late-exponential-growth phase. We constructed fusions of four TOL promoters, Pm (the promoter of the meta operon), Pu (the promoter of the upper operon), Ps (the promoter of the xylS regulatory gene), and Pr (the promoter of the xylR regulatory gene) with lacZ and examined, in Escherichia coli and P. putida, the expression of these promoters in relation to the growth phase. Expression from Pm, Pu, Ps, and Pr was almost constant if the host cells did not carry either xylS or xylR. Similarly, expression of Pm and Pu in P. putida in the absence of XylS and XylR was constant during the growth of the cells. XylS-dependent transcription of Pm and XylR-dependent transcription of Ps and Pu, in contrast, varied with the growth phase. This observation suggested that the interaction of XylS and XylR with target promoters or with RNA polymerases was influenced by the growth phase. The nature of the signal which triggers the growth-phase-dependent regulation was not clear. A change in the oxygen partial pressure was not responsible for the regulation. E. coli mutants defective in relA, crp, and cya exhibited growth-phase-dependent expression of the TOL catabolic genes, indicating that cyclic AMP and relA-dependent synthesis of ppGpp are not involved in this phenomenon.


J Bacteriol. 1990 December; 172(12): 6651-6660




This article has been cited by other articles:




Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
Appl. Environ. Microbiol. Infect. Immun. Eukaryot. Cell
Mol. Cell. Biol. J. Virol. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev.
ALL ASM JOURNALS

Copyright © 1990 by the American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.