This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Reprints and Permissions Copyright Information Books from ASM Press MicrobeWorld Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Govezensky, D Articles by Zamir, A Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Govezensky, D Articles by Zamir, A

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

J Bacteriol. 1991 October; 173(20): 6339-6346

research-article

Involvement of GroEL in nif gene regulation and nitrogenase assembly.

Biochemistry Department, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot, Israel.

ABSTRACT

Several approaches were used to study the role of GroEL, the prototype chaperonin, in the nitrogen fixation (nif) system. An Escherichia coli groEL mutant transformed with the Klebsiella pneumoniae nif gene cluster accumulated very low to nondetectable levels of nitrogenase components compared with the isogenic wild-type strain or the mutant cotransformed with the wild-type groE operon. In K. pneumoniae, overexpression of the E. coli groE operon markedly accelerated the rate of appearance of the MoFe protein and its constituent polypeptides after the start of derepression. The groEL mutation in E. coli decreased NifA-dependent beta-galactosidase expression from the nifH promoter but did not affect the constitutive expression of nifA from the tet promoter of ntr-controlled expression from the nifLA promoter. The possibility that GroEL is required for the correct folding of NifA was supported by coimmunoprecipitation of NifA with anti-GroEL antibodies. Kinetic analyses of nitrogenase assembly in 35S pulse-chased K. pneumoniae pointed to the existence of high-molecular-weight intermediates in MoFe protein assembly and demonstrated the transient binding of newly synthesized NifH and NifDK to GroEL. Overall, these results indicate that GroEL fulfills both regulatory and structural functions in the nif system.

This article has been cited by other articles:

• Bittner, A. N., Oke, V. (2006). Multiple groESL Operons Are Not Key Targets of RpoH1 and RpoH2 in Sinorhizobium meliloti.. J. Bacteriol. 188: 3507-3515 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Rubio, L. M., Ludden, P. W. (2005). Maturation of Nitrogenase: a Biochemical Puzzle. J. Bacteriol. 187: 405-414 [Full Text]  
• Karlin, S., Brocchieri, L. (2000). Heat shock protein 60 sequence comparisons: Duplications, lateral transfer, and mitochondrial evolution. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 97: 11348-11353 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Kim, S., Burgess, B. K. (1996). Evidence for the Direct Interaction of the nifW Gene Product with the MoFe Protein. J. Biol. Chem. 271: 9764-9770 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Ogawa, J, Long, S R (1995). The Rhizobium meliloti groELc locus is required for regulation of early nod genes by the transcription activator NodD.. Genes Dev. 9: 714-729 [Abstract]  
• Ribbe, M. W., Burgess, B. K. (2001). The chaperone GroEL is required for the final assembly of the molybdenum-iron protein of nitrogenase. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 98: 5521-5525 [Abstract] [Full Text]