JB
Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Foster, J W
Right arrow Articles by Hall, H K
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Foster, J W
Right arrow Articles by Hall, H K
J Bacteriol. 1992 July; 174(13): 4317-4323

research-article

Effect of Salmonella typhimurium ferric uptake regulator (fur) mutations on iron- and pH-regulated protein synthesis.

J W Foster and H K Hall

Department of Microbiology and Immunology, College of Medicine, University of South Alabama, Mobile 36688.

ABSTRACT

Fur is an important regulatory protein known to function in the presence of iron as a repressor of iron-controlled genes. It was recently discovered that Fur is also essential to Salmonella typhimurium for mounting an adaptive acid tolerance response (J. W. Foster, J. Bacteriol 173:6896-6902, 1991). Because little is known about the effect of Fur on the physiology of this enteric pathogen, a systematic two-dimensional polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (PAGE) analysis was conducted to identify proteins whose synthesis is linked to iron levels. Mutations in the fur locus were identified and used to classify which proteins are controlled by Fur. Thirty-six proteins were overtly affected by iron availability, most of which were clearly under the control of Fur. Although most of the Fur-dependent proteins were under negative control, a significant portion (15 of 34) appeared to be under a form of positive control. Nine of the positively controlled proteins required Fur and iron for expression. However, Fur lacking iron was also required for the induction of six gene products. Surprisingly, not all iron-regulated proteins were controlled by Fur and not all Fur-dependent proteins were obviously regulated by iron status. Because fur mutants fail to mount an effective acid tolerance response, we made a comparative two-dimensional PAGE analysis of 100 total acid- and iron-regulated gene products. Production of most of these proteins was regulated by only one of the two stresses, yet a clear subset of seven genes were influenced by both acid and iron and were also controlled by fur. These proteins were also members of the acid tolerance response modulon. Consistent with the fur effect on pH-regulated protein synthesis, fur mutants lacked the inducible pH homeostasis system associated with the acid tolerance response. The results provide further evidence that Fur has an extensive impact on gene expression and cellular physiology and suggest an explanation for the acid-sensitive nature of fur mutants.

J Bacteriol. 1992 July; 174(13): 4317-4323




This article has been cited by other articles:



Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
Appl. Environ. Microbiol. Infect. Immun. Eukaryot. Cell
Mol. Cell. Biol. J. Virol. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev.
ALL ASM JOURNALS

Copyright © 1992 by the American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.