JB
Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hamlett, N V
Right arrow Articles by Summers, A O
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hamlett, N V
Right arrow Articles by Summers, A O

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

J Bacteriol. 1992 October; 174(20): 6377-6385

research-article

Roles of the Tn21 merT, merP, and merC gene products in mercury resistance and mercury binding.

N V Hamlett, E C Landale, B H Davis and A O Summers

Department of Biology, Swarthmore College, Pennsylvania 19081.

ABSTRACT

The mercury resistance (mer) operon of the gram-negative transposon Tn21 encodes not only a mercuric reductase and regulatory genes but also two inner membrane proteins (MerT and MerC) and a periplasmic protein (MerP). Although the merT, merP, and merC genes have been implicated in Hg(II) transport, the individual roles of these genes have not been established. We created in vitro precise deletion and frameshift mutations that eliminated each of the genes singly and in combination. Our results show that both merT and merP are required for Hg(II) binding but that merC is not. Both merT and merP are required for full expression of Hg(II) resistance, but loss of merP is less deleterious than loss of merT. Furthermore, mutations eliminating both merT and merP decrease resistance more than the single mutations do. In contrast, mutating merC had no effect on Hg(II) resistance. Both the merT and merP mutations increase the threshold Hg(II) concentration for induction of merA-lacZ transcriptional fusions and cause an increase in the maximal expression level. In contrast, the merC mutation had little effect on the threshold inducing concentration of Hg(II) but decreased the level of expression. Our results show that merT and merP alone are sufficient to specify a mercury transport system. The role of merC remains obscure.


J Bacteriol. 1992 October; 174(20): 6377-6385




This article has been cited by other articles:




Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
Appl. Environ. Microbiol. Infect. Immun. Eukaryot. Cell
Mol. Cell. Biol. J. Virol. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev.
ALL ASM JOURNALS

Copyright © 1992 by the American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.