JB
Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mantis, N J
Right arrow Articles by Winans, S C
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Mantis, N J
Right arrow Articles by Winans, S C

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

J Bacteriol. 1992 February; 174(4): 1189-1196

research-article

The Agrobacterium tumefaciens vir gene transcriptional activator virG is transcriptionally induced by acid pH and other stress stimuli.

N J Mantis and S C Winans

Section of Microbiology, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York 14853.

ABSTRACT

A set of Agrobacterium tumefaciens operons required for pathogenesis is coordinately induced during plant infection by the VirA and VirG proteins. The intracellular concentration of VirG increases in response to acidic media, and this response was proposed to be regulated at the level of transcription at a promoter (P2) that resembles the Escherichia coli heat shock promoters. To test this hypothesis, we first constructed a virG-lacZ transcriptional fusion. A strain containing this fusion had higher levels of beta-galactosidase activity in acidic media than in media at neutral pH. Second, primer extension analysis of virG indicated that acidic media stimulated the transcription of this promoter. To determine whether P2 is a member of a heat shock-like regulon in A. tumefaciens, five agents that induce E. coli heat shock genes were tested for their abilities to induce a P2-lacZ fusion in A. tumefaciens. P2 was most strongly induced by low pH, was moderately stimulated by CdCl2 or mitomycin C, and was slightly induced by P2 as measured by beta-galactosidase activity and primer extension analysis. Induction by these treatments did not require any Ti plasmid-encoded function or the chromosomally encoded RecA protein. We also pulse-labeled cellular proteins after a shift to low pH and detected several proteins whose synthesis was induced by these conditions. We conclude that P2 is primarily induced by acid pH and secondarily by certain other stimuli, each of which is stressful to cell growth. This stress induction is at least partly independent of the heat shock and SOS responses.


J Bacteriol. 1992 February; 174(4): 1189-1196




This article has been cited by other articles:




Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
Appl. Environ. Microbiol. Infect. Immun. Eukaryot. Cell
Mol. Cell. Biol. J. Virol. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev.
ALL ASM JOURNALS

Copyright © 1992 by the American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.