This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Reprints and Permissions Copyright Information Books from ASM Press MicrobeWorld Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Gardina, P Articles by Manson, M Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Gardina, P Articles by Manson, M

research-article

Aspartate and maltose-binding protein interact with adjacent sites in the Tar chemotactic signal transducer of Escherichia coli.

Department of Biology, Texas A&M University, College Station 77843-3258.

ABSTRACT

The Tar protein of Escherichia coli is a chemotactic signal transducer that spans the cytoplasmic membrane and mediates responses to the attractants aspartate and maltose. Aspartate binds directly to Tar, whereas maltose binds to the periplasmic maltose-binding protein, which then interacts with Tar. The Arg-64, Arg-69, and Arg-73 residues of Tar have previously been shown to be involved in aspartate sensing. When lysine residues are introduced at these positions by site-directed mutagenesis, aspartate taxis is disrupted most by substitution at position 64, and maltose taxis is disrupted most by substitution at position 73. To explore the spatial distribution of ligand recognition sites on Tar further, we performed doped-primer mutagenesis in selected regions of the tar gene. A number of mutations that interfere specifically with aspartate taxis (Asp-), maltose taxis (Mal-), or both were identified. Mutations affecting residues 64 to 73 or 149 to 154 in the periplasmic domain of Tar are associated with an Asp- phenotype, whereas mutations affecting residues 73 to 83 or 141 to 150 are associated with a Mal- phenotype. We conclude that aspartate and maltose-binding protein interact with adjacent and partially overlapping regions in the periplasmic domain of Tar to initiate attractant signalling.

This article has been cited by other articles:

• Iwama, T., Ito, Y., Aoki, H., Sakamoto, H., Yamagata, S., Kawai, K., Kawagishi, I. (2006). Differential Recognition of Citrate and a Metal-Citrate Complex by the Bacterial Chemoreceptor Tcp. J. Biol. Chem. 281: 17727-17735 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Ward, S. M., Bormans, A. F., Manson, M. D. (2006). Mutationally Altered Signal Output in the Nart (NarX-Tar) Hybrid Chemoreceptor. J. Bacteriol. 188: 3944-3951 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Stockner, T., Vogel, H. J., Tieleman, D. P. (2005). A Salt-Bridge Motif Involved in Ligand Binding and Large-Scale Domain Motions of the Maltose-Binding Protein. Biophys. J 89: 3362-3371 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Richardson, J. S., Hynes, M. F., Oresnik, I. J. (2004). A Genetic Locus Necessary for Rhamnose Uptake and Catabolism in Rhizobium leguminosarum bv. trifolii. J. Bacteriol. 186: 8433-8442 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Lux, R., Shi, W. (2004). CHEMOTAXIS-GUIDED MOVEMENTS IN BACTERIA. Crit. Rev. Oral Biol. Med. 15: 207-220 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Szurmant, H., Ordal, G. W. (2004). Diversity in Chemotaxis Mechanisms among the Bacteria and Archaea. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 68: 301-319 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Mao, H., Cremer, P. S., Manson, M. D. (2003). A sensitive, versatile microfluidic assay for bacterial chemotaxis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 100: 5449-5454 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Peach, M. L., Hazelbauer, G. L., Lybrand, T. P. (2002). Modeling the transmembrane domain of bacterial chemoreceptors. Protein Sci. 11: 912-923 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Lybarger, S. R., Maddock, J. R. (2000). Differences in the polar clustering of the high- and low-abundance chemoreceptors of Escherichia coli. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 10.1073/pnas.130195397v1 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Iwama, T., Nakao, K.-I., Nakazato, H., Yamagata, S., Homma, M., Kawagishi, I. (2000). Mutational Analysis of Ligand Recognition by Tcp, the Citrate Chemoreceptor of Salmonella enterica Serovar Typhimurium. J. Bacteriol. 182: 1437-1441 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Burkart, M., Toguchi, A., Harshey, R. M. (1998). The chemotaxis system, but not chemotaxis, is essential for swarming motility in Escherichia coli. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 95: 2568-2573 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Boos, W., Shuman, H. (1998). Maltose/Maltodextrin System of Escherichia coli: Transport, Metabolism, and Regulation. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 62: 204-229 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Weerasuriya, S., Schneider, B. M., Manson, M. D. (1998). Chimeric Chemoreceptors in Escherichia coli: Signaling Properties of Tar-Tap and Tap-Tar Hybrids. J. Bacteriol. 180: 914-920 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Zhang, Y., Mannering, D. E., Davidson, A. L., Yao, N., Manson, M. D. (1996). Maltose-binding Protein Containing an Interdomain Disulfide Bridge Confers a Dominant-negative Phenotype for Transport and Chemotaxis. J. Biol. Chem. 271: 17881-17889 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Nara, T., Kawagishi, I., Nishiyama, S.-i., Homma, M., Imae, Y. (1996). Modulation of the Thermosensing Profile of the Escherichia coli Aspartate Receptor Tar by Covalent Modification of Its Methyl-accepting Sites. J. Biol. Chem. 271: 17932-17936 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Bjorkman, A. M., Dunten, P., Sandgren, M. O. J., Dwarakanath, V. N., Mowbray, S. L. (2001). Mutations That Affect Ligand Binding to the Escherichia coli Aspartate Receptor. IMPLICATIONS FOR TRANSMEMBRANE SIGNALING. J. Biol. Chem. 276: 2808-2815 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Lybarger, S. R., Maddock, J. R. (2000). Differences in the polar clustering of the high- and low-abundance chemoreceptors of Escherichia coli. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 97: 8057-8062 [Abstract] [Full Text]