JB
Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Chisholm, G E
Right arrow Articles by Cooper, T G
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Chisholm, G E
Right arrow Articles by Cooper, T G
J Bacteriol. 1992 April; 174(8): 2548-2559

research-article

Ty insertions upstream and downstream of native DUR1,2 promoter elements generate different patterns of DUR1,2 expression in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

G E Chisholm and T G Cooper

Department of Microbiology and Immunology, University of Tennessee, Memphis 38163.

ABSTRACT

Expression of allantoin pathway genes is subject to induction and nitrogen catabolite repression. Two classes of cis-dominant mutations (DUR80 and DUR1,2-Oh) result in overproduction of DUR1,2 mRNA. In DUR80 mutants, DUR1,2 expression remained inducible, nitrogen catabolite repression sensitive, and unresponsive to cell ploidy, i.e., overproduction was superimposed on normal gene regulation. DUR1,2-Oh mutations, in contrast, generated a pattern of DUR1,2 expression similar to that often reported when a Ty element inserts upstream of a gene, the ROAM phenotype. We analyzed four independent DUR80 and DUR1,2-Oh alleles. The DUR1,2-Oh mutation was, as expected, a Ty insertion at -445 3' of the native DUR1,2 upstream activation sequences (UASs). All three DUR80 alleles were also Ty insertions between -644 and -653 immediately 5' of the native DUR1,2 USASs. We suggest that the difference in DUR1,2-Oh and DUR80 phenotypes depends on whether the native cis-acting elements and transcription factors associated with them can operate. If they can, enhancement of normally regulated DUR1,2 expression is observed. This is a novel phenotype for Ty insertions. If the native DUR1,2 cis-acting elements are not present, the case when Ty insertion occurs 3' of them, a ROAM phenotype is generated. Nitrogen-regulated upstream activation sequence (UASNTR)-homologous sequences present in the Ty delta elements rather than cis-acting elements required for Ty transcription are the most likely candidates to serve as the cis-acting elements mediating the DUR80 phenotype.


J Bacteriol. 1992 April; 174(8): 2548-2559




This article has been cited by other articles:




Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
Appl. Environ. Microbiol. Infect. Immun. Eukaryot. Cell
Mol. Cell. Biol. J. Virol. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev.
ALL ASM JOURNALS

Copyright © 1992 by the American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.