JB
Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Fujita, M
Right arrow Articles by Amemura, A
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Fujita, M
Right arrow Articles by Amemura, A
J Bacteriol. 1993 November; 175(21): 6953-6958

research-article

Transcription of the cam operon and camR genes in Pseudomonas putida PpG1.

M Fujita, H Aramaki, T Horiuchi and A Amemura

Department of Biotechnology, Faculty of Engineering, Fukuyama University, Hiroshima, Japan.

ABSTRACT

In Pseudomonas putida carrying the CAM plasmid, the operon (camDCAB) encoding enzymes involved in the degradation pathway of D-camphor is negatively regulated by the CamR protein, and camR is autorepressed. S1 nuclease mapping revealed that camDCAB and camR were divergently transcribed from overlapping promoters, the transcription start sites were separated by 11 bp, and transcriptions of the cam operon (camDCAB) and camR increased about 10- and 4-fold, respectively, immediately after addition of camphor. The transcriptions of camDCAB and camR were negatively regulated through the interaction of the CamR protein with the one operator located in the overlapping promoter region. In vitro transcription experiments were performed to characterize the regulation of cam genes. The camR promoter was initiated by P. putida RNA polymerase containing sigma 70, but transcription from the camDCAB promoter by sigma 70 holoenzyme was not observed. The purified CamR protein repressed in vitro transcription from the camR promoter. This repression was suppressed by camphor. The RNA polymerase binding region of the camR promoter was identified by using DNase I footprinting. In addition, footprinting studies revealed that the CamR protein and RNA polymerase coexisted on the promoter region in a joint nonproductive complex.


J Bacteriol. 1993 November; 175(21): 6953-6958




This article has been cited by other articles:




Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
Appl. Environ. Microbiol. Infect. Immun. Eukaryot. Cell
Mol. Cell. Biol. J. Virol. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev.
ALL ASM JOURNALS

Copyright © 1993 by the American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.