JB
Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Yu, A
Right arrow Articles by Haggård-Ljungquist, E
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Yu, A
Right arrow Articles by Haggård-Ljungquist, E
J Bacteriol. 1993 December; 175(24): 7848-7855

research-article

The Cox protein is a modulator of directionality in bacteriophage P2 site-specific recombination.

A Yu and E Haggård-Ljungquist

Department of Cell and Molecular Biology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.

ABSTRACT

The P2 Cox protein is known to repress the Pc promoter, which controls the expression of the P2 immunity repressor C. It has also been shown that Cox can activate the late promoter PLL of the unrelated phage P4. By this process, a P2 phage infecting a P4 lysogen is capable of inducing replication of the P4 genome, an example of viral transactivation. In this report, we present evidence that Cox is also directly involved in both prophage excision and phage integration. While purified Cox, in addition to P2 Int and Escherichia coli integration host factor, was required for attR x attL (excisive) recombination in vitro, it was inhibitory to attP x attB (integrative) recombination. The same amounts of Int and integration host factor which mediated optimal excisive recombination in vitro also mediated optimal integrative recombination. We quantified and compared the relative efficiencies of attB, attR, and attL in recombination with attP and discuss the functional implications of the results. DNase I protection experiments revealed an extended 70-bp Cox-protected region on the right arm of attP, centered at about +60 bp from the center of the core sequence. Gel shift assays suggest that there are two Cox binding sites within this region. Together, these data support the theory that in vivo, P2 can exert control over the direction of recombination by either expressing Int alone or Int and Cox together.


J Bacteriol. 1993 December; 175(24): 7848-7855




This article has been cited by other articles:




Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
Appl. Environ. Microbiol. Infect. Immun. Eukaryot. Cell
Mol. Cell. Biol. J. Virol. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev.
ALL ASM JOURNALS

Copyright © 1993 by the American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.