Previous Article | Next Article 
J Bacteriol. 1993 February; 175(4): 1134-1143
Sequence analysis and phenotypic characterization of groEL mutations that block lambda and T4 bacteriophage growth.
J Zeilstra-Ryalls,
O Fayet,
L Baird and
C Georgopoulos
Department of Cellular, Viral, and Molecular Biology University of Utah, School of Medicine, Salt Lake City.
ABSTRACT
The groES and groEL genes of Escherichia coli have been shown previously to belong to a single operon under heat shock regulation. Both proteins have been universally conserved in nature, as judged by the presence of similar proteins throughout evolution. The GroEL protein has been shown to bind promiscuously to many unfolded proteins, thus preventing their aggregation. ATP hydrolysis by GroEL results in the release of the bound polypeptides, a process that often requires the action of GroES. In an effort to understand GroEL and GroES structure and function, we have determined the nucleotide changes of nine mutant alleles of groEL. All of these mutant alleles were isolated because they block bacteriophage lambda growth. Our sequencing results demonstrate that (i) many of these alleles are identical, in spite of the fact that they were independently isolated, and (ii) most of the different alleles are clustered in the same region of the gene. One of the mutant alleles was shown to possess two nucleotide alterations in the groEL coding phase, one of which is located in a putative ATP-binding domain. The two nucleotide changes were separated by genetic engineering, and each individual change was shown to exert an effect on bacteriophage growth. But, using genetic analyses, we demonstrate that the restriction on bacterial growth at elevated temperatures is conferred only by the mutation within the putative ATP-binding domain. We have cloned the mutant alleles on multicopy plasmids and overexpressed their products. By testing for the ability of bacteriophage either to propagate or to form colonies at 43 degrees C, we have been able to divide the mutant proteins into those with no activity and those with residual activity under the various conditions tested.
J Bacteriol. 1993 February; 175(4): 1134-1143
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
Layton, J. C., Foster, P. L.
(2005). Error-Prone DNA Polymerase IV Is Regulated by the Heat Shock Chaperone GroE in Escherichia coli. J. Bacteriol.
187: 449-457
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Figueiredo, L., Klunker, D., Ang, D., Naylor, D. J., Kerner, M. J., Georgopoulos, C., Hartl, F. U., Hayer-Hartl, M.
(2004). Functional Characterization of an Archaeal GroEL/GroES Chaperonin System: SIGNIFICANCE OF SUBSTRATE ENCAPSULATION. J. Biol. Chem.
279: 1090-1099
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Reischl, S., Wiegert, T., Schumann, W.
(2002). Isolation and Analysis of Mutant Alleles of the Bacillus subtilis HrcA Repressor with Reduced Dependency on GroE Function. J. Biol. Chem.
277: 32659-32667
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Klein, G., Georgopoulos, C.
(2001). Identification of Important Amino Acid Residues That Modulate Binding of Escherichia coli GroEL to Its Various Cochaperones. Genetics
158: 507-517
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
DeLisa, M. P., Valdes, J. J., Bentley, W. E.
(2001). Mapping Stress-Induced Changes in Autoinducer AI-2 Production in Chemostat-Cultivated Escherichia coli K-12. J. Bacteriol.
183: 2918-2928
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Bernstein, H. D., Hyndman, J. B.
(2001). Physiological Basis for Conservation of the Signal Recognition Particle Targeting Pathway in Escherichia coli. J. Bacteriol.
183: 2187-2197
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Aramli, L. A., Teschke, C. M.
(1999). Single Amino Acid Substitutions Globally Suppress the Folding Defects of Temperature-sensitive Folding Mutants of Phage P22 Coat Protein. J. Biol. Chem.
274: 22217-22224
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Richardson, A., Georgopoulos, C.
(1999). Genetic Analysis of the Bacteriophage T4-Encoded Cochaperonin Gp31. Genetics
152: 1449-1457
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Richardson, A., van der Vies, S. M., Keppel, F., Taher, A., Landry, S. J., Georgopoulos, C.
(1999). Compensatory Changes in GroEL/Gp31 Affinity as a Mechanism for Allele-specific Genetic Interaction. J. Biol. Chem.
274: 52-58
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Nakonechny, W. S., Teschke, C. M.
(1998). GroEL and GroES Control of Substrate Flux in the in Vivo Folding Pathway of Phage P22 Coat Protein. J. Biol. Chem.
273: 27236-27244
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Chatellier, J., Hill, F., Lund, P. A., Fersht, A. R.
(1998). In vivo activities of GroEL minichaperones. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
95: 9861-9866
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Veinger, L., Diamant, S., Buchner, J., Goloubinoff, P.
(1998). The Small Heat-shock Protein IbpB from Escherichia coli Stabilizes Stress-denatured Proteins for Subsequent Refolding by a Multichaperone Network. J. Biol. Chem.
273: 11032-11037
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Grimaud, R., Toussaint, A.
(1998). Assembly of Both the Head and Tail of Bacteriophage Mu Is Blocked in Escherichia coli groEL and groES Mutants. J. Bacteriol.
180: 1148-1153
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Ogawa, J, Long, S R
(1995). The Rhizobium meliloti groELc locus is required for regulation of early nod genes by the transcription activator NodD.. Genes Dev.
9: 714-729
[Abstract]
-
Ang, D., Richardson, A., Mayer, M. P., Keppel, F., Krisch, H., Georgopoulos, C.
(2001). Pseudo-T-even Bacteriophage RB49 Encodes CocO, a Cochaperonin for GroEL, Which Can Substitute for Escherichia coli's GroES and Bacteriophage T4's Gp31. J. Biol. Chem.
276: 8720-8726
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Richardson, A., Schwager, F., Landry, S. J., Georgopoulos, C.
(2001). The Importance of a Mobile Loop in Regulating Chaperonin/ Co-chaperonin Interaction. HUMANS VERSUS ESCHERICHIA COLI. J. Biol. Chem.
276: 4981-4987
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
Copyright © 1993 by the American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.