JB
Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mullin, D A
Right arrow Articles by Newton, A
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Mullin, D A
Right arrow Articles by Newton, A
J Bacteriol. 1993 April; 175(7): 2067-2076

research-article

A sigma 54 promoter and downstream sequence elements ftr2 and ftr3 are required for regulated expression of divergent transcription units flaN and flbG in Caulobacter crescentus.

D A Mullin and A Newton

Department of Cell and Molecular Biology, Tulane University, New Orleans, Louisiana 70118-5698.

ABSTRACT

In this study, we investigated the cis-acting sequences required for transcription of the divergent, cell cycle-regulated flaN and flbG operons of Caulobacter crescentus. Previous work showed that transcription of flbG in vivo depends on a sigma 54 promoter and a sequence element called ftr1 that is located about 100 bp upstream from the transcription start site (D. A. Mullin and A. Newton, J. Bacteriol. 171:3218-3227, 1989). We now show that regulation of flaN transcription in vivo depends on a sigma 54 promoter and two ftr elements located downstream of the transcription start site at +86 (ftr2) and +120 (ftr3). Mutations in or between the conserved elements at -24 and -12 in this sigma 54 promoter reduced or abolished flaN transcription, and one mutation that eliminated flaN expression led to an increased level of flbG transcript. Mutations in ftr2 resulted in greatly reduced levels of flaN transcript but had no noticeable effect on flbG transcript levels. All three mutations constructed in ftr3 resulted in elevated flaN and flbG transcript levels. We conclude that ftr2 is required for positive regulation of flaN, whereas ftr3 appears to play a negative regulatory role in flaN and flbG expression. To explain the coordinated positive activation and negative autoregulation of these two transcription units and the effect of mutations on gene expression, we propose a model in which the flaN and flbG promoters interact through alternative DNA looping to form structures that are transcriptionally active or inactive.


J Bacteriol. 1993 April; 175(7): 2067-2076




This article has been cited by other articles:




Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
Appl. Environ. Microbiol. Infect. Immun. Eukaryot. Cell
Mol. Cell. Biol. J. Virol. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev.
ALL ASM JOURNALS

Copyright © 1993 by the American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.