This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Reprints and Permissions Copyright Information Books from ASM Press MicrobeWorld Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Robinson, J B Articles by Bauer, W D Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Robinson, J B Articles by Bauer, W D

research-article

Relationships between C4 dicarboxylic acid transport and chemotaxis in Rhizobium meliloti.

Department of Agronomy, Ohio State University, Columbus 43210.

ABSTRACT

The relationship between chemotaxis and transport of C4 dicarboxylic acids was analyzed with Rhizobium meliloti dct mutants defective in one or all of the genes required for dicarboxylic acid transport. Succinate, malate, and fumarate were moderately potent chemoattractants for wild-type R. meliloti and appeared to share a common chemoreceptor. While dicarboxylate transport is inducible, taxis to succinate was shown to be constitutive. Mutations in the dctA and dctB genes both resulted in the reduction, but not elimination, of chemotactic responses to succinate, indicating that transport via DctA or chemosensing via DctB is not essential for C4 dicarboxylate taxis, although they appear to contribute to it. Mutations in dctD and rpoN genes did not affect taxis to succinate. Aspartate, which is also transported by the dicarboxylate transport system, elicited strong chemotactic responses via a chemoreceptor distinct from the succinate-malate-fumarate receptor. Taxis to aspartate was unaltered in dctA and dctB mutants but was considerably reduced in both dctD and rpoN mutants, indicating that aspartate taxis is strongly dependent on elements responsible for transcriptional activation of dctA. Methylation and methanol release experiments failed to show a significant increase in methyl esterification of R. meliloti proteins in response to any of the attractants tested.

This article has been cited by other articles:

• Meier, V. M., Muschler, P., Scharf, B. E. (2007). Functional Analysis of Nine Putative Chemoreceptor Proteins in Sinorhizobium meliloti. J. Bacteriol. 189: 1816-1826 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Brencic, A., Winans, S. C. (2005). Detection of and Response to Signals Involved in Host-Microbe Interactions by Plant-Associated Bacteria. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 69: 155-194 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Alexandre, G., Zhulin, I. B. (2001). More Than One Way To Sense Chemicals. J. Bacteriol. 183: 4681-4686 [Full Text]  
• Wei, X., Bauer, W. D. (1998). Starvation-Induced Changes in Motility, Chemotaxis, and Flagellation of Rhizobium meliloti. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 64: 1708-1714 [Abstract] [Full Text]