JB
Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lovett, C M
Right arrow Articles by Woodruff, J N
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lovett, C M, Jr
Right arrow Articles by Woodruff, J N

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

J Bacteriol. 1994 August; 176(16): 4914-4923

research-article

Analysis of the SOS inducing signal in Bacillus subtilis using Escherichia coli LexA as a probe.

C M Lovett Jr, T M O'Gara and J N Woodruff

Department of Chemistry, Williams College, Williamstown, Massachusetts 01267.

ABSTRACT

We analyzed the Bacillus subtilis SOS response using Escherichia coli LexA protein as a probe to measure the kinetics of SOS activation and DNA repair in wild-type and DNA repair-deficient strains. By examining the effects of DNA-damaging agents that produce the SOS inducing signal in E. coli by three distinct pathways, we obtained evidence that the nature of the SOS inducing signal has been conserved in B. subtilis. In particular, we used the B. subtilis DNA polymerase III inhibitor, 6-(p-hydroxyphenylazo)-uracil, to show that DNA replication is required to generate the SOS inducing signal following UV irradiation. We also present evidence that single-stranded gaps, generated by excision repair, serve as part of the UV inducing signal. By assaying the SOS response in B. subtilis dinA, dinB, and dinC mutants, we identified distinct deficiencies in SOS activation and DNA repair that suggest roles for the corresponding gene products in the SOS response.


J Bacteriol. 1994 August; 176(16): 4914-4923




This article has been cited by other articles:




Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
Appl. Environ. Microbiol. Infect. Immun. Eukaryot. Cell
Mol. Cell. Biol. J. Virol. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev.
ALL ASM JOURNALS

Copyright © 1994 by the American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.