JB
Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mackenzie, C.
Right arrow Articles by Weinstock, G. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Mackenzie, C.
Right arrow Articles by Weinstock, G. M.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

J. Bacteriol., Jun 1995, 3027-3035, Vol 177, No. 11
Copyright © 1995, American Society for Microbiology

DNA repair mutants of Rhodobacter sphaeroides

C Mackenzie, M Chidambaram, EJ Sodergren, S Kaplan and GM Weinstock
Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Texas Medical School, Houston 77225, USA.

The genome of the photosynthetic eubacterium Rhodobacter sphaeroides 2.4.1 comprises two chromosomes and five endogenous plasmids and has a 65% G+C base composition. Because of these characteristics of genome architecture, as well as the physiological advantages that allow this organism to live in sunlight when in an anaerobic environment, the sensitivity of R. sphaeroides to UV radiation was compared with that of the more extensively studied bacterium Escherichia coli. R. sphaeroides was found to be more resistant, being killed at about 60% of the rate of E. coli. To begin to analyze the basis for this increased resistance, a derivative of R. sphaeroides, strain 2.4.1 delta S, which lacks the 42-kb plasmid, was mutagenized with a derivative of Tn5, and the transposon insertion mutants were screened for increased UV sensitivity (UVs). Eight UVs strains were isolated, and the insertion sites were determined by contour-clamped homogeneous electric field pulsed-field gel electrophoresis. These mapped to at least five different locations in chromosome I. Preliminary analysis suggested that these mutants were deficient in the repair of DNA damage. This was confirmed for three loci by DNA sequence analysis, which showed the insertions to be within genes homologous to uvrA, uvrB, and uvrC, the subunits of the nuclease responsible for excising UV damage.


This article has been cited by other articles:




Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
Appl. Environ. Microbiol. Infect. Immun. Eukaryot. Cell
Mol. Cell. Biol. J. Virol. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev.
ALL ASM JOURNALS

Copyright © 1995 by the American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.