This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Reprints and Permissions Copyright Information Books from ASM Press MicrobeWorld Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Miksch, G. Articles by Dobrowolski, P. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Miksch, G. Articles by Dobrowolski, P.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

J. Bacteriol., Sep 1995, 5374-5378, Vol 177, No. 18
Copyright © 1995, American Society for Microbiology

Growth phase-dependent induction of stationary-phase promoters of Escherichia coli in different gram-negative bacteria

G Miksch and P Dobrowolski
Abteilung Biotechnologie, Fakultat fur Biowissenschaften, Pharmazie und Psychologie, Universitat Leipzig, Germany.

RSF1010-derived plasmids carrying a fusion of a promoterless lacZ gene with the sigma s-dependent growth phase-regulated promoters of Escherichia coli, bolAp1 and fic, were constructed. The plasmids were mobilized into the gram-negative bacterial species Acetobacter methanolicus, Xanthomonas campestris, Pseudomonas putida, and Rhizobium meliloti. The beta-galactosidase activities of bacterial cultures were determined during exponential and stationary growth phases. Transcriptional activation of the fic promoter in the different bacteria was growth phase dependent as in E. coli and was initiated generally during the transition to stationary phase. The induction of the bolA promoter was also growth phase dependent in the bacteria tested. While the expression in E. coli and R. meliloti was initiated during the transition from exponential to stationary phase, the induction in A. methanolicus, P. putida, and X. campestris started some hours after stationary growth phase was reached. In all the species tested, DNA fragments hybridizing with the rpoS gene of E. coli were detected. The results show that in different gram-negative bacteria, stationary-phase-specific sigma factors which are structurally and functionally homologous to sigma s and are able to recognize the promoter sequences of both bolA and fic exist.

This article has been cited by other articles:

• Saumaa, S., Tover, A., Kasak, L., Kivisaar, M. (2002). Different Spectra of Stationary-Phase Mutations in Early-Arising versus Late-Arising Mutants of Pseudomonas putida: Involvement of the DNA Repair Enzyme MutY and the Stationary-Phase Sigma Factor RpoS. J. Bacteriol. 184: 6957-6965 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Koch, B., Worm, J., Jensen, L. E., Hojberg, O., Nybroe, O. (2001). Carbon Limitation Induces {sigma}S-Dependent Gene Expression in Pseudomonas fluorescens in Soil. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 67: 3363-3370 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Ramos-González, M. I., Molin, S. (1998). Cloning, Sequencing, and Phenotypic Characterization of the rpoS Gene from Pseudomonas putida KT2440. J. Bacteriol. 180: 3421-3431 [Abstract] [Full Text]