JB
Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Feng, J.
Right arrow Articles by Ninfa, A. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Feng, J.
Right arrow Articles by Ninfa, A. J.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

J. Bacteriol., 10 1995, 5523-5534, Vol 177, No. 19
Copyright © 1995, American Society for Microbiology

Activation of transcription initiation from the nac promoter of Klebsiella aerogenes

J Feng, TJ Goss, RA Bender and AJ Ninfa
Department of Biological Chemistry, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor 48109, USA.

The nac gene of Klebsiella aerogenes encodes a bifunctional transcription factor that activates or represses the expression of several operons under conditions of nitrogen limitation. In experiments with purified components, transcription from the nac promoter was initiated by sigma 54 RNA polymerase and was activated by the phosphorylated form of nitrogen regulator I (NRI) (NtrC). The activation of the nac promoter required a higher concentration of NRI approximately P than did the activation of the Escherichia coli glnAp2 promoter, and both the promoter and upstream enhancer element contributed to this difference. The nac promoter had a lower affinity for sigma 54 RNA polymerase than did glnAp2, and uninitiated competitor- resistant transcription complexes formed at the nac promoter decayed to competitor-sensitive complexes at a greater rate than did similar complexes formed at the glnAp2 promoter. The nac enhancer, consisting of a single high-affinity NRI-binding site and an adjacent site with low affinity for NRI, was less efficient in stimulating transcription than was the glnA enhancer, which consists of two adjacent high- affinity NRI-binding sites. When these binding sites were exchanged, transcription from the nac promoter was increased and transcription from the glnAp2 promoter was decreased at low concentrations of NRI approximately P. Another indication of the difference in the efficiency of these enhancers is that although activation of a nac promoter construct containing the glnA enhancer was relatively insensitive to subtle alterations in the position of these sites relative to the position of the promoter, activation of the natural nac promoter or a nac promoter construct containing only a single high-affinity NRI approximately P binding site was strongly affected by subtle alterations in the position of the NRI approximately P binding site(s), indicating a face-of-the-helix dependency for activation.


This article has been cited by other articles:




Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
Appl. Environ. Microbiol. Infect. Immun. Eukaryot. Cell
Mol. Cell. Biol. J. Virol. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev.
ALL ASM JOURNALS

Copyright © 1995 by the American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.