J. Bacteriol., 05 1996, 2825-2835, Vol 178, No. 10
Copyright © 1996, American Society for Microbiology

Surveying a supercoil domain by using the gamma delta resolution system in Salmonella typhimurium

NP Higgins, X Yang, Q Fu and JR Roth
Department of Biochemistry, University of Alabama at Birmingham, 35294- 2170, USA. nphiggins@bmg.bhs.uab.edu

A genetic system was developed to investigate the supercoil structure of bacterial chromosomes. New res-carrying transposons were derived from MudI1734 (MudJr1 and MudJr2) and Tn10 (Tn10dGn). The MudJr1 and MudJr2 elements each have a res site in opposite orientation so that when paired with a Tn10dGn element in the same chromosome, one MudJr res site will be ordered as a direct repeat. Deletion formation was studied in a nonessential region (approximately 100 kb) that extends from the his operon through the cob operon. Strains with a MudJr insertion in the cobT gene at the 5' end of the cob operon plus a Tn10dGn insertion positioned either clockwise or counterclockwise from cobT were exposed to a burst of RES protein. Following a pulse of resolvase expression, deletion formation was monitored by scoring the loss of the Lac+ phenotype or by loss of tetracycline resistance. In exponentially growing populations, deletion products appeared quickly in some cells (in 10 min) but also occurred more than an hour after RES induction. The frequency of deletion (y) diminished with increasing distance (x) between res sites. Results from 15 deletion intervals fit the exponential equation y = 120 . 10(-0.02x). We found that res sites can be plectonemically interwound over long distances ( > 100 kb) and that barriers to supercoil diffusion are placed stochastically within the 43- to 45-min region of the chromosome.

This article has been cited by other articles:

• Champion, K., Higgins, N. P. (2007). Growth Rate Toxicity Phenotypes and Homeostatic Supercoil Control Differentiate Escherichia coli from Salmonella enterica Serovar Typhimurium. J. Bacteriol. 189: 5839-5849 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Wright, M. A., Kharchenko, P., Church, G. M., Segre, D. (2007). Chromosomal periodicity of evolutionarily conserved gene pairs. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 104: 10559-10564 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Hsu, Y.-H., Chung, M.-W., Li, T.-K. (2006). Distribution of gyrase and topoisomerase IV on bacterial nucleoid: implications for nucleoid organization. Nucleic Acids Res 34: 3128-3138 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Pang, Z., Chen, R., Manna, D., Higgins, N. P. (2005). A Gyrase Mutant with Low Activity Disrupts Supercoiling at the Replication Terminus. J. Bacteriol. 187: 7773-7783 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Postow, L., Hardy, C. D., Arsuaga, J., Cozzarelli, N. R. (2004). Topological domain structure of the Escherichia coli chromosome. Genes Dev. 18: 1766-1779 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Deng, S., Stein, R. A., Higgins, N. P. (2004). Transcription-induced barriers to supercoil diffusion in the Salmonella typhimurium chromosome. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 101: 3398-3403 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Postow, L., Crisona, N. J., Peter, B. J., Hardy, C. D., Cozzarelli, N. R. (2001). Topological challenges to DNA replication: Conformations at the fork. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 98: 8219-8226 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Guijo, M. I., Patte, J., del Mar Campos, M., Louarn, J.-M., Rebollo, J. E. (2001). Localized Remodeling of the Escherichia coli Chromosome: The Patchwork of Segments Refractory and Tolerant to Inversion Near the Replication Terminus. Genetics 157: 1413-1423 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Pato, M. L., Banerjee, M. (1999). Replacement of the Bacteriophage Mu Strong Gyrase Site and Effect on Mu DNA Replication. J. Bacteriol. 181: 5783-5789 [Abstract] [Full Text]