JB Try AEM Online
Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Baumgartner, J. W.
Right arrow Articles by Hazelbauer, G. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Baumgartner, J. W.
Right arrow Articles by Hazelbauer, G. L.

J. Bacteriol., 08 1996, 4651-4660, Vol 178, No. 15
Copyright © 1996, American Society for Microbiology

Mutational analysis of a transmembrane segment in a bacterial chemoreceptor

JW Baumgartner and GL Hazelbauer
Department of Biochemistry and Biophysics, Washington State University, Pullman 99164-4660, USA.

Trg is a member of a family of receptors that mediates chemotaxis by Escherichia coli. Its transmembrane domain is a loose four-helix bundle consisting of two helices from each of the two identical subunits. This domain mediates transmembrane signaling through a conformational change in which the second transmembrane segment (TM2) is thought to move relative to TM1, but mutational analysis of TM2 by cysteine scanning had identified only a few positions at which substitutions perturbed function or induced signaling. Thus, we performed mutational analysis by random mutagenesis and screening. Among 42 single-residue substitutions in TM2 that detectably altered function, 16 had drastic effects on receptor activity. These substitutions defined a helical face of TM2. This functionally important surface was directed into the protein interior of the transmembrane domain, where TM2 faces the helices or the other subunit. The functionally perturbing substitutions did not appear to cause general disruption of receptor structure but rather had more specific effects, altering aspects of transmembrane signaling. An in vivo assay of signaling identified some substitutions that reduced and others that induced signaling. These two classes were distributed along adjacent helical faces in a pattern that strongly supports the notion that conformational signaling involves movement between TM2 and TM1 and that signaling is optimal when stable interactions are maintained across the interface between the homologous helices in the transmembrane domain. Our mutational analysis also revealed a striking tolerance of the chemoreceptor for substitutions, including charged residues, usually considered to be disruptive of transmembrane segments.


This article has been cited by other articles:




Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
Appl. Environ. Microbiol. Infect. Immun. Eukaryot. Cell
Mol. Cell. Biol. J. Virol. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev.
ALL ASM JOURNALS

Copyright © 1996 by the American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.