JB Track the topics, authors and articles important to you
Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hall, H. K.
Right arrow Articles by Foster, J. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hall, H. K.
Right arrow Articles by Foster, J. W.

J. Bacteriol., 10 1996, 5683-5691, Vol 178, No. 19
Copyright © 1996, American Society for Microbiology

The role of fur in the acid tolerance response of Salmonella typhimurium is physiologically and genetically separable from its role in iron acquisition

HK Hall and JW Foster
Department of Microbiology and Immunology, College of Medicine, University of South Alabama, Mobile 36688, USA.

The response of Salmonella typhimurium to low pH includes a low-pH protection system called the acid tolerance response (ATR). The iron- regulatory protein Fur has been implicated in the ATR since fur mutants are acid sensitive and cause altered expression of several acid shock proteins (J. W. Foster, J. Bacteriol. 173:6896-6902, 1991). We have determined that the acid-sensitive phenotype of fur mutations is indeed due to a defect in Fur that can be complemented by a fur(+)-containing plasmid. However, changes in cellular iron status alone did not trigger the ATR. Cells clearly required exposure to low pH in order to induce acid tolerance. The role of Fur in acid tolerance was found to extend beyond regulating iron acquisition. A mutation in fur converting histidine 90 to an arginine (H90R) eliminated Fur-mediated iron regulation of enterochelin production and deregulated an iroA-lacZ fusion but had no effect on acid tolerance. The H90R iron-blind Fur protein also mediated acid shock induction of several Fur-dependent acid shock proteins and acid control of the hyd locus. In addition, a Fur superrepressor that constitutively repressed iron-regulated genes mediated normal Fur-dependent acid tolerance and pH-controlled gene expression. The results indicate the acid-sensing and iron-sensing mechanisms of Fur are separable by mutation and reinforce the concept of Fur as a major global regulator in the cell.


This article has been cited by other articles:




Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
Appl. Environ. Microbiol. Infect. Immun. Eukaryot. Cell
Mol. Cell. Biol. J. Virol. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev.
ALL ASM JOURNALS

Copyright © 1996 by the American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.