JB Try JVI Online
Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Garza, A. G.
Right arrow Articles by Manson, M. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Garza, A. G.
Right arrow Articles by Manson, M. D.

J. Bacteriol., Nov 1996, 6116-6122, Vol 178, No. 21
Copyright © 1996, American Society for Microbiology

Extragenic suppression of motA missense mutations of Escherichia coli

AG Garza, PA Bronstein, PA Valdez, LW Harris-Haller and MD Manson
Department of Biology, Texas A&M University, College Station 77843- 3258, USA.

The MotA and MotB proteins are thought to comprise elements of the stator component of the flagellar motor of Escherichia coli. In an effort to understand interactions among proteins within the motor, we attempted to identify extragenic suppressors of 31 dominant, plasmid- borne alleles of motA. Strains containing these mutations were either nonmotile or had severely impaired motility. Four of the mutants yielded extragenic suppressors mapping to the FlaII or FlaIIIB regions of the chromosome. Two types of suppression were observed. Suppression of one type (class I) probably results from increased expression of the chromosomal motB gene due to relief of polarity. Class I suppressors were partial deletions of Mu insertion sequences in the disrupted chromosomal motA gene. Class I suppression was mimicked by expressing the wild-type MotB protein from a second, compatible plasmid. Suppression of the other type (class II) was weaker, and it was not mimicked by overproduction of wild-type MotB protein. Class II suppressors were point mutations in the chromosomal motB or fliG genes. Among 14 independent class II suppressors characterized by DNA sequencing, we identified six different amino acid substitutions in MotB and one substitution in FliG. A number of the strongest class II suppressors had alterations of residues 136 to 138 of MotB. This particular region within the large, C-terminal periplasmic domain of MotB has previously not been associated with a specific function. We suggest that residues 136 to 138 of MotB may interact directly with the periplasmic face of MotA or help position the N-terminal membrane- spanning helix of MotB properly to interact with the membrane-spanning helices of the MotA proton channel.


This article has been cited by other articles:




Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
Appl. Environ. Microbiol. Infect. Immun. Eukaryot. Cell
Mol. Cell. Biol. J. Virol. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev.
ALL ASM JOURNALS

Copyright © 1996 by the American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.