JB Try MCB Online
Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ogasawara, W.
Right arrow Articles by Morikawa, Y.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ogasawara, W.
Right arrow Articles by Morikawa, Y.

J. Bacteriol., 11 1996, 6288-6295, Vol 178, No. 21
Copyright © 1996, American Society for Microbiology

Two types of novel dipeptidyl aminopeptidases from Pseudomonas sp. strain WO24

W Ogasawara, G Kobayashi, H Okada and Y Morikawa
Department of Bioengineering, Nagaoka University of Technology, Niigata, Japan.

Two kinds of dipeptidyl aminopeptidase I (DAP I [cathepsin C])-like activities which hydrolyze Gly-Phe-p-nitroanilide (Gly-Phe-pNA) were detected in Pseudomonas sp. strain WO24. They were purified and characterized. The isolated enzymes, named DAP BII and DAP BIII, were revealed to be homogeneous by sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) and isoelectric focusing. DAP BII was estimated to have a molecular mass of 150,000 Da by gel filtration and a subunit size of 73,000 Da by SDS-PAGE, indicating it to be a homodimer. The molecular mass of DAP BIII was evaluated to be approximately 60,000 Da by gel filtration and 69,000 Da by SDS-PAGE, indicating that it is monomeric. The isoelectric points of DAP BII and DAP BIII were 6.1 and 5.0, and their optimal pHs were 8.0 and 8.5 to 9.0, respectively. The result of peptide mapping for DAP BII and DAP BIII showed that these enzymes consist of different components. Both enzymes were completely inhibited by diisopropylphosphofluoride but not by general thiol inhibitors, indicating that they are serine proteases. DAP BII and DAP BIII hydrolyzed Gly-Phe-pNA but not Gly-Arg-pNA, both of which are model substrates for mammalian DAP I. Despite these shared activities toward DAP I, DAP BII released dipeptides from Ala-Ala-pNA and Lys-Ala-4-methylcoumarinamide (a substrate for DAP II), whereas DAP BIII did not hydrolyze either of these compounds and was presumed to prefer substrates composed of bulky, hydrophobic amino acids at P1 and P1' positions. In addition, DAP BII showed no endopeptidase activity, whereas DAP BIII possessed the activity on N-terminally blocked peptide derivatives besides exopeptidase activity. Assays performed with bioactive peptides such as angiotensin I and neuromedin N as substrates indicate that DAP BII has a considerably broader substrate specificity than DAP BIII and is able to hydrolyze an X-Pro bond, an imido bond that few peptidases and no known DAPs can cleave. These characteristics, namely, substrate specificities, molecular mass, pI, peptide mapping, pH optimum, and effect of inhibitors, suggested that the two DAPs purified in this work are distinct enzymes and do not belong to any of the previously reported DAP classes.


This article has been cited by other articles:




Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
Appl. Environ. Microbiol. Infect. Immun. Eukaryot. Cell
Mol. Cell. Biol. J. Virol. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev.
ALL ASM JOURNALS

Copyright © 1996 by the American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.