J. Bacteriol., 12 1996, 6658-6664, Vol 178, No. 23
Copyright © 1996, American Society for Microbiology

Competition between functional signal peptides demonstrates variation in affinity for the secretion pathway

H Chen, J Kim and DA Kendall
Department of Molecular and Cell Biology, The University of Connecticut, Storrs 06269, USA.

We have developed a system for examining the relative affinity of two different signal peptides for the protein secretion pathway in Escherichia coli. This system involves the expression of a modified alkaline phosphatase which possesses two signal peptides arranged in tandem. When both signal peptides have the wild-type sequence, cleavage after the first and cleavage after the second occur with nearly equal frequency. In both cases the remainder of the protein is transported to the periplasm. Thus both signal peptides effectively compete with each other for entrance to the secretion pathway. When the hydrophobicity of the second signal peptide is altered by small increments, we find that the more hydrophobic signal peptide is preferentially utilized. Thus, a more hydrophobic signal peptide can outcompete even an efficient wild- type signal sequence. The crossover point, for utilization of the second to the first signal peptide, is marked and occurs over a very small change in hydrophobicity. Our results suggest that the small differences in the hydrophobicity of wild-type signal peptides may have critical consequences: preproteins with the more hydrophobic signals could dominate one pathway, leaving those with only slightly less hydrophobic signals to require additional factors such as chaperonins, SecB, and other binding proteins.

This article has been cited by other articles:

• Ravn, P., Arnau, J., Madsen, S. M., Vrang, A., Israelsen, H. (2003). Optimization of signal peptide SP310 for heterologous protein production in Lactococcus lactis. Microbiology 149: 2193-2201 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Sarker, S., Oliver, D. (2002). Critical Regions of secM That Control Its Translation and Secretion and Promote Secretion-Specific secA Regulation. J. Bacteriol. 184: 2360-2369 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Kim, J., Kendall, D. A. (1998). Identification of a Sequence Motif That Confers SecB Dependence on a SecB-Independent Secretory Protein In Vivo. J. Bacteriol. 180: 1396-1401 [Abstract] [Full Text]