JB Tips for Better Browsing
Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Landgraf, J. R.
Right arrow Articles by Calvo, J. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Landgraf, J. R.
Right arrow Articles by Calvo, J. M.

J. Bacteriol., Dec 1996, 6930-6936, Vol 178, No. 23
Copyright © 1996, American Society for Microbiology

Effects of nutrition and growth rate on Lrp levels in Escherichia coli

JR Landgraf, J Wu and JM Calvo
Section of Biochemistry, Molecular and Cell Biology, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York 14853, USA.

Lrp (leucine-responsive regulatory protein) activates some Escherichia coli operons that function in anabolism and represses others involved in catabolism (for a review, see J. M. Calvo and R. G. Matthews, Microbiol. Rev. 58:466-490, 1994). This overall pattern suggests that Lrp may help cells adapt to changes in the nutritional environment. Here, we tested the idea that the nutritional richness of the medium determines the amount of Lrp in cells. Lrp was measured directly by Western blotting (immunoblotting) in cells grown in a chemically defined rich medium or in a minimal medium. In addition, transcription from the lrp promoter was assessed with a lacZ reporter gene. The results with these two different measurements were nearly the same, indicating that under the conditions employed, beta-galactosidase measurements can accurately reflect Lrp levels. For cells in a minimal medium, Lrp levels were consistently lowest during the logarithmic phase of growth, but overall, there was not much variation in levels as a function of growth phase (1.3-fold difference between highest and lowest values). However, for cells in a rich medium, Lrp levels dropped 3- to 4-fold during the lag phase, remained constant during the log phase, and then rose to starting levels upon entry into the stationary phase. When cells in the log phase were compared, Lrp levels were 3- to 4-fold higher in cells growing in a minimal medium than those in a rich medium. The levels of lrp expression were the same or slightly higher in strains containing mutations in rpoS, cya, or crp compared with wild- type strains, suggesting that neither RpoS nor the cyclic AMP (cAMP) receptor protein-cAMP complex is required for expression. On the other hand, lrp expression was severely restricted in cells that could not make ppGpp because of mutations in relA and spoT. The reduced expression of lrp during logarithmic growth in a rich medium may be due to low ppGpp levels under these conditions. The repressive effects of rich medium and the stimulatory effects of ppGpp were also observed with a construct having only a minimal lrp promoter (-57 to +21). The results of other experiments suggest that Lrp levels vary inversely with the growth rate of cells instead of being determined by some component of the medium.


This article has been cited by other articles:



Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
Appl. Environ. Microbiol. Infect. Immun. Eukaryot. Cell
Mol. Cell. Biol. J. Virol. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev.
ALL ASM JOURNALS

Copyright © 1996 by the American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.