JB
Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Grishanin, R. N.
Right arrow Articles by Armitage, J. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Grishanin, R. N.
Right arrow Articles by Armitage, J. P.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

J. Bacteriol., Jan 1997, 24-30, Vol 179, No. 1
Copyright © 1997, American Society for Microbiology

Photoresponses in Rhodobacter sphaeroides: role of photosynthetic electron transport

RN Grishanin, DE Gauden and JP Armitage
Microbiology Unit, Biochemistry Department, University of Oxford, United Kingdom.

Rhodobacter sphaeroides responds to a decrease in light intensity by a transient stop followed by adaptation. There is no measurable response to increases in light intensity. We confirmed that photosynthetic electron transport is essential for a photoresponse, as (i) inhibitors of photosynthetic electron transport inhibit photoresponses, (ii) electron transport to oxidases in the presence of oxygen reduces the photoresponse, and (iii) the magnitude of the response is dependent on the photopigment content of the cells. The photoresponses of cells grown in high light, which have lower concentrations of light- harvesting photopigment and reaction centers, saturated at much higher light intensities than the photoresponses of cells grown in low light, which have high concentrations of light-harvesting pigments and reaction centers. We examined whether the primary sensory signal from the photosynthetic electron transport chain was a change in the electrochemical proton gradient or a change in the rate of electron transport itself (probably reflecting redox sensing). R. sphaeroides showed no response to the addition of the proton ionophore carbonyl cyanide 4-trifluoromethoxyphenylhydrazone, which decreased the electrochemical proton gradient, although a behavioral response was seen to a reduction in light intensity that caused an equivalent reduction in proton gradient. These results strongly suggest that (i) the photosynthetic apparatus is the primary photoreceptor, (ii) the primary signal is generated by a change in the rate of electron transport, (iii) the change in the electrochemical proton gradient is not the primary photosensory signal, and (iv) stimuli affecting electron transport rates integrate via the electron transport chain.


This article has been cited by other articles:




Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
Appl. Environ. Microbiol. Infect. Immun. Eukaryot. Cell
Mol. Cell. Biol. J. Virol. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev.
ALL ASM JOURNALS

Copyright © 1997 by the American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.