This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Belanger, C.
Right arrow Articles by Dion, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Belanger, C.
Right arrow Articles by Dion, P.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

J. Bacteriol., Apr 1997, 2305-2313, Vol 179, No. 7
Copyright © 1997, American Society for Microbiology

Variable efficiency of a Ti plasmid-encoded VirA protein in different agrobacterial hosts

C Belanger, I Loubens, EW Nester and P Dion
Recherche en Sciences de la Vie et de la Sante, Universite Laval, Sainte-Foy, Quebec, Canada.

The transconjugant CB100, harboring the Ti plasmid from the Agrobacterium tumefaciens biovar 2 strain D10B/87 in the chromosomal background of the biovar 1 strain C58, was defective in vir gene induction. This defect was corrected in the presence of virA from pTiA6. Based on this complementation result and an analysis of the induction requirements of the transconjugant CB100 and its parent strains, it was hypothesized that the defective vir gene induction in CB100 was related to a dysfunctional interaction between the pTi- encoded D10B/87 VirA and the chromosome-encoded C58 ChvE. To verify this hypothesis, D10B/87 and C58 virA were compared, and conclusions from this first set of analyses were then corroborated by comparing D10B/87 and C58 chvE. Whereas only a few nucleotide differences were identified in the promoters and 5' ends of the coding regions of D10B/87 and C58 virA, analysis of hybrid virA genes showed that these differences collectively accounted for the poor vir gene induction of strain CB100. In contrast with the sequence similarity of the VirA proteins, extensive divergence was seen between the chromosome-encoded D10B/87 and C58 ChvE. Although D10B/87 chvE introduced in trans had little effect on vir gene induction of CB100, it enhanced the induction response of a strain CB100 derivative in which the chromosomal C58 chvE had been inactivated by marker exchange. These results suggest that chromosomal backgrounds provided by different strains of A. tumefaciens are not equivalent for VirA function. Following conjugative transfer of certain Ti plasmids to a new agrobacterial host, evolution of the newly introduced virA, or coevolution of chvE and virA, may lead to optimization of ChvE-VirA interaction and vir gene induction levels.


This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Krishnamohan, A., Balaji, V., Veluthambi, K. (2001). Efficient vir Gene Induction in Agrobacterium tumefaciens Requires virA, virG, and vir Box from the Same Ti Plasmid. J. Bacteriol. 183: 4079-4089 [Abstract] [Full Text]