JB
Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Karls, R. K.
Right arrow Articles by Donohue, T. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Karls, R. K.
Right arrow Articles by Donohue, T. J.

J. Bacteriol., 01 1998, 10-19, Vol 180, No. 1
Copyright © 1998, American Society for Microbiology

Metabolic roles of a Rhodobacter sphaeroides member of the sigma32 family [In Process Citation]

RK Karls, J Brooks, P Rossmeissl, J Luedke and TJ Donohue
Department of Bacteriology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, 53706, USA.

We report the role of a gene (rpoH) from the facultative phototroph Rhodobacter sphaeroides that encodes a protein (sigma37) similar to Escherichia coli sigma32 and other members of the heat shock family of eubacterial sigma factors. R. sphaeroides sigma37 controls genes that function during environmental stress, since an R. sphaeroides deltaRpoH mutant is approximately 30-fold more sensitive to the toxic oxyanion tellurite than wild-type cells. However, the deltaRpoH mutant lacks several phenotypes characteristic of E. coli cells lacking sigma32. For example, an R. sphaeroides deltaRpoH mutant is not generally defective in phage morphogenesis, since it plates the lytic virus RS1, as well as its wild-type parent. In characterizing the response of R. sphaeroides to heat, we found that its growth temperature profile is different when cells generate energy by aerobic respiration, anaerobic respiration, or photosynthesis. However, growth of the deltaRpoH mutant is comparable to that of a wild-type strain under each of these conditions. The deltaRpoH mutant mounted a heat shock response when aerobically grown cells were shifted from 30 to 42 degrees C, but it exhibited altered induction kinetics of approximately 120-, 85-, 75-, and 65-kDa proteins. There was also reduced accumulation of several presumed heat shock transcripts (rpoD P(HS), groESL1, etc.) when aerobically grown deltaRpoH cells were placed at 42 degrees C. Under aerobic conditions, it appears that another sigma factor enables the deltaRpoH mutant to mount a heat shock response, since either RNA polymerase preparations from an deltaRpoH mutant, reconstituted Esigma37, or a holoenzyme containing a 38-kDa protein (sigma38) each transcribed E. coli Esigma32- dependent promoters. The lower growth temperature profile of photosynthetic cells is correlated with a difference in heat-inducible gene expression, since neither wild-type cells or the deltaRpoH mutant mount a typical heat shock response after such cultures were shifted from 30 to 37 degrees C.


This article has been cited by other articles:




Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
Appl. Environ. Microbiol. Infect. Immun. Eukaryot. Cell
Mol. Cell. Biol. J. Virol. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev.
ALL ASM JOURNALS

Copyright © 1998 by the American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.