This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Seto, S.
Right arrow Articles by Miyata, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Seto, S.
Right arrow Articles by Miyata, M.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

J. Bacteriol., 01 1998, 256-264, Vol 180, No. 2
Copyright © 1998, American Society for Microbiology

Cell reproduction and morphological changes in Mycoplasma capricolum [In Process Citation]

S Seto and M Miyata
Department of Biology, Faculty of Science, Osaka City University, Osaka, Japan.

The cell reproduction of Mycoplasma capricolum was studied. The velocity of DNA replication fork progression was about 6 kb/min, which is 10 times slower than that of Escherichia coli. The time required for one round of DNA replication accorded with the doubling time. The origin/terminus ratio was 2.0. M. capricolum cell morphology was classified into two types, rod and branched. In the ordinary-growth phase, the rod cells accounted for about 90% of the total population, with branched cells comprising the remaining 10%. The proportion of branched cells increased to 90% following inhibition of DNA replication by nucleoside starvation. An increase in the proportion of branched cells was induced by transfer of a temperature-sensitive mutant deficient in DNA replication to the restrictive temperature. The rod cells had a regular structure, a fixed cell length, and constrictions in the center. The DNA contents of individual rod cells were distributed with a standard deviation of 0.40 of average. The branched cells had irregular structures and a wide distribution of DNA contents. Counting of viable cells revealed that the cells ceased division upon cell type conversion; however, branched cells maintained a reproductive capacity. A model for the reproduction process is proposed.


This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Lartigue, C., Glass, J. I., Alperovich, N., Pieper, R., Parmar, P. P., Hutchison, C. A. III, Smith, H. O., Venter, J. C. (2007). Genome Transplantation in Bacteria: Changing One Species to Another. Science 317: 632-638 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Zaritsky, A., Woldringh, C. L., Einav, M., Alexeeva, S. (2006). Use of thymine limitation and thymine starvation to study bacterial physiology and cytology.. J. Bacteriol. 188: 1667-1679 [Full Text]  
  • Rocha, E. P. C. (2004). The replication-related organization of bacterial genomes. Microbiology 150: 1609-1627 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Glew, M. D., Marenda, M., Rosengarten, R., Citti, C. (2002). Surface Diversity in Mycoplasma agalactiae Is Driven by Site-Specific DNA Inversions within the vpma Multigene Locus. J. Bacteriol. 184: 5987-5998 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Seto, S., Layh-Schmitt, G., Kenri, T., Miyata, M. (2001). Visualization of the Attachment Organelle and Cytadherence Proteins of Mycoplasma pneumoniae by Immunofluorescence Microscopy. J. Bacteriol. 183: 1621-1630 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Miyata, M., Yamamoto, H., Shimizu, T., Uenoyama, A., Citti, C., Rosengarten, R. (2000). Gliding mutants of Mycoplasma mobile: relationships between motility and cell morphology, cell adhesion and microcolony formation. Microbiology 146: 1311-1320 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Seto, S., Miyata, M. (1999). Partitioning, Movement, and Positioning of Nucleoids in Mycoplasma capricolum. J. Bacteriol. 181: 6073-6080 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Razin, S., Yogev, D., Naot, Y. (1998). Molecular Biology and Pathogenicity of Mycoplasmas. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 62: 1094-1156 [Abstract] [Full Text]