JB
Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Magnuson, R.
Right arrow Articles by Yarmolinsky, M. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Magnuson, R.
Right arrow Articles by Yarmolinsky, M. B.

Journal of Bacteriology, December 1998, p. 6342-6351, Vol. 180, No. 23
0021-9193/98/$00.00+0

Corepression of the P1 Addiction Operon by Phd and Doc

Roy Magnuson* and Michael B. Yarmolinsky

Laboratory of Biochemistry, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland 20892-4225

Received 26 June 1998/Accepted 2 October 1998

The P1 plasmid addiction operon encodes Doc, a toxin that kills plasmid-free segregants, and Phd, an unstable antidote that neutralizes the toxin. Additionally, these products repress transcription of the operon. The antidote binds to two adjacent sites in the promoter. Here we present evidence concerning the regulatory role of the toxin, which we studied with the aid of a mutation, docH66Y. The DocH66Y protein retained the regulatory properties of the wild-type protein, but not its toxicity. In vivo, DocH66Y enhanced repression by Phd but failed to affect repression in the absence of Phd, suggesting that DocH66Y contacts Phd. In vitro, a MalE-DocH66Y fusion protein was found to bind Phd. Binding of toxin to antidote may be the physical basis for the neutralization of toxin. DocH66Y failed to bind DNA in vitro yet enhanced the affinity, cooperativity, and specificity with which Phd bound the operator. Although DocH66Y enhanced the binding of Phd to two adjacent Phd-binding sites, DocH66Y had relatively little effect on the binding of Phd to a single Phd-binding site, indicating that DocH66Y mediates cooperative interactions between adjacent Phd-binding sites. Several electrophoretically distinct protein-DNA complexes were observed with different amounts of DocH66Y relative to Phd. Maximal repression and specificity of DNA binding were observed with subsaturating amounts of DocH66Y relative to Phd. Analogous antidote-toxin pairs appear to have similar autoregulatory circuits. Autoregulation, by dampening fluctuations in the levels of toxin and antidote, may prevent the inappropriate activation of the toxin.

* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Building 37, Room 4D15, 37 Convent Dr., Bethesda, MD 20892-4225. Phone: (301) 496-5558. Fax: (301) 402-3095. E-mail: roy{at}sunspot.nci.nih.gov.

Journal of Bacteriology, December 1998, p. 6342-6351, Vol. 180, No. 23
0021-9193/98/$00.00+0


This article has been cited by other articles:



Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
Appl. Environ. Microbiol. Infect. Immun. Eukaryot. Cell
Mol. Cell. Biol. J. Virol. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev.
ALL ASM JOURNALS

Copyright © 1998 by the American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.