This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kaltenbach, L.
Right arrow Articles by Low, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kaltenbach, L.
Right arrow Articles by Low, D.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

J Bacteriol, March 1998, p. 1224-1231, Vol. 180, No. 5
0021-9193/98/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1998, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.

Use of a Two-Color Genetic Screen To Identify a Domain of the Global Regulator Lrp That Is Specifically Required for pap Phase Variation

Linda Kaltenbach, Bruce Braaten, Julie Tucker, Margareta Krabbe, and David Low*

Division of Cell Biology and Immunology, Department of Pathology, University of Utah Health Sciences Center, Salt Lake City, Utah 84132

Received 10 March 1997/Accepted 27 December 1997

The global regulator Lrp plays a central role as both a repressor and an activator in Pap phase variation. Unlike most other members of the Lrp regulon such as ilvIH, activation of papBA transcription requires the coregulator PapI and is methylation dependent. We developed a two-color genetic screen to identify Lrp mutations that inhibit Pap phase variation but still activate ilvIH transcription, reasoning that such mutations might identify PapI binding or methylation-responsive domains. Amino acid substitutions in Lrp at position 126, 133, or 134 greatly reduced the rate of Pap switching from phase off to phase on but had much smaller effects on ilvIH transcription. In vitro analyses indicated that the T134A and E133G Lrp variants maintained affinities for pap and ilvIH DNAs similar to those of wild-type Lrp. In addition, both mutant Lrp's were as responsive to PapI as wild-type Lrp, evidenced by an increase in affinity for pap Lrp binding sites 4, 5, and 6. Thus, in vitro analyses did not reveal the step(s) in Pap phase variation where these Lrp mutants were inhibited. In vivo analyses showed that both the T134A and E133G Lrp mutants activated transcription of a phase-on-locked pap derivative containing a mutation in Lrp binding site 3. Further studies indicated that the T134A Lrp mutant was blocked in a step in Pap phase variation that does not involve PapI. Our data suggest that these mutant Lrp's are defective in a previously unidentified interaction required for the switch from the phase-off to the phase-on pap transcription state.


* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Division of Cell Biology and Immunology, Department of Pathology, University of Utah Health Sciences Center, 50 N. Medical Dr., Salt Lake City, UT 84132. Phone: (801) 581-4901. Fax: (801) 581-8946. E-mail: Low{at}medschool.med.utah.edu.




This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Berthiaume, F., Crost, C., Labrie, V., Martin, C., Newman, E. B., Harel, J. (2004). Influence of L-Leucine and L-Alanine on Lrp Regulation of foo, Coding for F1651, a Pap Homologue. J. Bacteriol. 186: 8537-8541 [Abstract] [Full Text]