This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Maldonado, R.
Right arrow Articles by Herr, A. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Maldonado, R.
Right arrow Articles by Herr, A. J.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

J Bacteriol, April 1998, p. 1822-1830, Vol. 180, No. 7
0021-9193/98/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1998, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.

Efficiency of T4 Gene 60 Translational Bypassing

Rafael Maldonadodagger and Alan J. Herr*

Department of Human Genetics and Howard Hughes Medical Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah 84112

Received 2 October 1997/Accepted 30 January 1998

Ribosomes translating bacteriophage T4 gene 60 mRNA bypass 50 noncoding nucleotides from a takeoff site at codon 46 to a landing site just upstream of codon 47. A key signal for efficient bypassing is contained within the nascent peptide synthesized prior to takeoff. Here we show that this signal is insensitive to the addition of coding information at its N terminus. In addition, analysis of amino-terminal fusions, which allow detection of all major products synthesized from the gene 60 mRNA, show that 50% of ribosomes bypass the coding gap while the rest either terminate at a UAG stop codon immediately following codon 46 or fail to resume coding. Bypassing efficiency estimates significantly lower than 50% were obtained with enzymatic reporter systems that relied on comparing test constructs to constructs with a precise excision of the gap (gap deletion). Further analysis showed that these estimates are distorted by differences between test and gap deletion functional mRNA levels. An internal translation initiation site at Met12 of gene 60 (which eliminates part of the essential nascent peptide) also distorts these estimates. Together, these results support an efficiency estimate of ~50%, less than previously reported. This estimate suggests that bypassing efficiency is determined by the competition between reading signals and release factors and gives new insight into the kinetics of bypassing signal action.


* Corresponding author. Mailing address: 6160 Eccles Institute of Human Genetics, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84112. Phone: (801) 581-5192. Fax: (801) 585-3910. E-mail: aherr{at}genetics.utah.edu.

dagger Present address: Area de Genetica, Dpto. Biotecnologia, Universidad de Alicante, 03080 Alicante, Spain.




This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Liiv, A., O'Connor, M. (2006). Mutations in the Intersubunit Bridge Regions of 23 S rRNA. J. Biol. Chem. 281: 29850-29862 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • O'Connor, M., Gregory, S. T., Dahlberg, A. E. (2004). Multiple defects in translation associated with altered ribosomal protein L4. Nucleic Acids Res 32: 5750-5756 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Miller, E. S., Kutter, E., Mosig, G., Arisaka, F., Kunisawa, T., Ruger, W. (2003). Bacteriophage T4 Genome. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 67: 86-156 [Abstract] [Full Text]