This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Nielsen, K. L.
Right arrow Articles by Cowan, N. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Nielsen, K. L.
Right arrow Articles by Cowan, N. J.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Journal of Bacteriology, September 1999, p. 5871-5875, Vol. 181, No. 18
0021-9193/99/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1999, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.

A Single-Ring Mitochondrial Chaperonin (Hsp60-Hsp10) Can Substitute for GroEL-GroES In Vivo

Kåre L. Nielsen,1,dagger Neil McLennan,2,Dagger Millicent Masters,2 and Nicholas J. Cowan1,*

Department of Biochemistry, New York University Medical Center, New York, New York 10016,1 and Institute of Cell and Molecular Biology, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH9 3JR, Scotland2

Received 23 March 1999/Accepted 10 June 1999

Chaperonins participate in the facilitated folding of a variety of proteins in vivo. To see whether the same spectrum of target proteins can be productively folded by the double-ring prokaryotic chaperonin GroEL-GroES and its single-ring human mitochondrial homolog, Hsp60-Hsp10, we expressed the latter in an Escherichia coli strain engineered so that the groE operon is under strict regulatory control. We found that expression of Hsp60-Hsp10 restores viability to cells that no longer express GroEL-GroES, formally demonstrating that Hsp60-Hsp10 can carry out all essential in vivo functions of GroEL-GroES.

* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Department of Biochemistry, New York University Medical Center, New York, NY 10016. Phone: (212) 263-5809. Fax: (212) 263-8166. E-mail: CowanN01{at}mcrcr6.med.nyu.edu.

dagger Present address: Laboratory of Biotechnology, Aalborg Universitet, Aalborg, Denmark.

Dagger Present address: CJD Surveillance Unit, Department of Pathology, University of Edinburgh, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, Scotland.

Journal of Bacteriology, September 1999, p. 5871-5875, Vol. 181, No. 18
0021-9193/99/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1999, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.


This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Hu, Y., Henderson, B., Lund, P. A., Tormay, P., Ahmed, M. T., Gurcha, S. S., Besra, G. S., Coates, A. R. M. (2008). A Mycobacterium tuberculosis Mutant Lacking the groEL Homologue cpn60.1 Is Viable but Fails To Induce an Inflammatory Response in Animal Models of Infection. Infect. Immun. 76: 1535-1546 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Guisbert, E., Herman, C., Lu, C. Z., Gross, C. A. (2004). A chaperone network controls the heat shock response in E. coli. Genes Dev. 18: 2812-2821 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Hashiguchi, K., Stuart, J. A., de Souza-Pinto, N. C., Bohr, V. A. (2004). The C-terminal {alpha}O helix of human Ogg1 is essential for 8-oxoguanine DNA glycosylase activity: the mitochondrial {beta}-Ogg1 lacks this domain and does not have glycosylase activity. Nucleic Acids Res 32: 5596-5608 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Richardson, A., Schwager, F., Landry, S. J., Georgopoulos, C. (2001). The Importance of a Mobile Loop in Regulating Chaperonin/ Co-chaperonin Interaction. HUMANS VERSUS ESCHERICHIA COLI. J. Biol. Chem. 276: 4981-4987 [Abstract] [Full Text]  


Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology.   For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»