Journal of Bacteriology, October 1999, p. 6152-6159, Vol. 181, No. 19
0021-9193/99/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1999, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
Department of Biochemistry, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York 10461
Received 3 June 1999/Accepted 27 July 1999
Expression of the catalase-peroxidase of Caulobacter
crescentus, a gram-negative member of the
subdivision of the
Proteobacteria, is 50-fold higher in stationary-phase
cultures than in exponential cultures. To identify regulators of the
starvation response, Tn5 insertion mutants were isolated
with reduced expression of a katG::lacZ fusion on
glucose starvation. One insertion interrupted an open reading frame
encoding a protein with significant amino acid sequence identity to
TipA, a helix-turn-helix transcriptional activator in the response of
Streptomyces lividans to the peptide antibiotic thiostrepton, and lesser sequence similarity to other helix-turn-helix regulators in the MerR family. The C. crescentus orthologue
of tipA was named skgA (stationary-phase
regulation of katG). Stationary-phase expression of
katG was reduced by 70% in the
skgA::Tn5 mutant, and
stationary-phase resistance to hydrogen peroxide decreased by a factor
of 10. Like the wild type, the skgA mutant exhibited starvation-induced cross-resistance to heat and acid shock, entered into the helical morphology that occurs after 9 to 12 days in stationary phase, and during exponential growth induced
katG in response to hydrogen peroxide challenge. Expression
of skgA increased 5- to 10-fold in late exponential phase.
skgA is the first regulator of a starvation-induced stress
response identified in C. crescentus. SkgA is not a global
regulator of the stationary-phase stress response; its action
encompasses the oxidative stress-hydrogen peroxide response but not
acid or heat responses. Moreover, SkgA is not an alternative
factor, like RpoS, which controls multiple aspects of
starvation-induced cross-resistance to stress in enteric bacteria.
These observations raise the possibility that regulation of
stationary-phase gene expression in this member of the
subdivision of the Proteobacteria is different from that in
Escherichia coli and other members of the
subdivision.
This article has been cited by other articles:
| Appl. Environ. Microbiol. | Infect. Immun. | Eukaryot. Cell |
|---|---|---|
| Mol. Cell. Biol. | J. Virol. | Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. |
| ALL ASM JOURNALS |