Journal of Bacteriology, December 2000, p. 7035-7043, Vol. 182, No. 24
0021-9193/00/$04.00+0
Copyright © 2000, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
andDepartment of Biochemistry, University of Dundee, Dundee DD1 5EH, Scotland,1 and Nitrogen Fixation Laboratory, John Innes Centre, Norwich NR4 7UH,2 United Kingdom
Received 28 June 2000/Accepted 3 October 2000
The expression of the moa locus, which encodes enzymes
required for molybdopterin biosynthesis, is enhanced under
anaerobiosis but repressed when the bacterium is able to synthesize
active molybdenum cofactor. In addition, moa expression
exhibits a strong requirement for molybdate. The molybdate enhancement
of moa transcription is fully dependent upon the
molybdate-binding protein, ModE, which also mediates molybdate
repression of the mod operon encoding the high-affinity
molybdate uptake system. Due to the repression of moa in
molybdenum cofactor-sufficient strains, the positive molybdate
regulation of moa is revealed only in strains unable to
make the active cofactor. Transcription of moa is
controlled at two sigma-70-type promoters immediately
upstream of the moaA gene. Deletion mutations covering the
region upstream of moaA have allowed each of the
promoters to be studied in isolation. The distal promoter is the site
of the anaerobic enhancement which is Fnr-dependent. The
molybdate induction of moa is exerted at the proximal
promoter. Molybdate-ModE binds adjacent to the
35 region of this
promoter, acting as a direct positive regulator of moa. The
molybdenum cofactor repression also appears to act at the proximal
transcriptional start site, but the mechanism remains to be
established. Tungstate in the growth medium affects moa
expression in two ways. Firstly, it can act as a functional molybdate
analogue for the ModE-mediated regulation. Secondly, tungstate brings
about the loss of the molybdenum cofactor repression of
moa. It is proposed that the tungsten derivative of the
molybdenum cofactor, which is known to be formed under such conditions,
is ineffective in bringing about repression of moa. The
complex control of moa is discussed in relation to the
synthesis of molybdoenzymes in the bacterium.
Present address: Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology,
University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria 3010, Australia.
This article has been cited by other articles:
| Appl. Environ. Microbiol. | Infect. Immun. | Eukaryot. Cell |
|---|---|---|
| Mol. Cell. Biol. | J. Virol. | Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. |
| ALL ASM JOURNALS |