JB
Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mustard, J. A.
Right arrow Articles by Little, J. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Mustard, J. A.
Right arrow Articles by Little, J. W.

Journal of Bacteriology, March 2000, p. 1659-1670, Vol. 182, No. 6
0021-9193/00/$04.00+0
Copyright © 2000, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.

Analysis of Escherichia coli RecA Interactions with LexA, lambda  CI, and UmuD by Site-Directed Mutagenesis of recA

Julie A. Mustard1,dagger and John W. Little1,2,*

Departments of Biochemistry1 and Molecular and Cellular Biology,2 University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona 85721

Received 30 September 1999/Accepted 6 December 1999

An early event in the induction of the SOS system of Escherichia coli is RecA-mediated cleavage of the LexA repressor. RecA acts indirectly as a coprotease to stimulate repressor self-cleavage, presumably by forming a complex with LexA. How complex formation leads to cleavage is not known. As an approach to this question, it would be desirable to identify the protein-protein interaction sites on each protein. It was previously proposed that LexA and other cleavable substrates, such as phage lambda  CI repressor and E. coli UmuD, bind to a cleft located between two RecA monomers in the crystal structure. To test this model, and to map the interface between RecA and its substrates, we carried out alanine-scanning mutagenesis of RecA. Twenty double mutations were made, and cells carrying them were characterized for RecA-dependent repair functions and for coprotease activity towards LexA, lambda  CI, and UmuD. One mutation in the cleft region had partial defects in cleavage of CI and (as expected from previous data) of UmuD. Two mutations in the cleft region conferred constitutive cleavage towards CI but not towards LexA or UmuD. By contrast, no mutations in the cleft region or elsewhere in RecA were found to specifically impair the cleavage of LexA. Our data are consistent with binding of CI and UmuD to the cleft between two RecA monomers but do not provide support for the model in which LexA binds in this cleft.


* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Department of Biochemistry, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721. Phone: (520) 621-5629. Fax: (520) 621-3709. E-mail: jlittle{at}u.arizona.edu.

dagger Present address: Department of Zoology, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand.


Journal of Bacteriology, March 2000, p. 1659-1670, Vol. 182, No. 6
0021-9193/00/$04.00+0
Copyright © 2000, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.



This article has been cited by other articles:




Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
Appl. Environ. Microbiol. Infect. Immun. Eukaryot. Cell
Mol. Cell. Biol. J. Virol. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev.
ALL ASM JOURNALS

Copyright © 2000 by the American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.