This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Martin, A. C.
Right arrow Articles by Armitage, J. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Martin, A. C.
Right arrow Articles by Armitage, J. P.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Journal of Bacteriology, December 2001, p. 7135-7144, Vol. 183, No. 24
0021-9193/01/$04.00+0   DOI: 10.1128/JB.183.24.7135-7144.2001
Copyright © 2001, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.

CheR- and CheB-Dependent Chemosensory Adaptation System of Rhodobacter sphaeroides

Angela C. Martin, George H. Wadhams, Deepan S. H. Shah,dagger Steven L. Porter, Jeevani C. Mantotta, Tim J. Craig, Peter H. Verdult, Helen Jones, and Judith P. Armitage*

Microbiology Unit, Department of Biochemistry, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 3QU, United Kingdom

Received 25 June 2001/Accepted 18 September 2001

Rhodobacter sphaeroides has multiple homologues of most of the Escherichia coli chemotaxis genes, organized in three major operons and other, unlinked, loci. These include cheA1 and cheR1 (che Op1) and cheA2, cheR2, and cheB1 (che Op2). In-frame deletions of these cheR and cheB homologues were constructed and the chemosensory behaviour of the resultant mutants examined on swarm plates and in tethered cell assays. Under the conditions tested, CheR2 and CheB1 were essential for normal chemotaxis, whereas CheR1 was not. cheR2 and cheB1, but not cheR1, were also able to complement the equivalent E. coli mutants. However, none of the proteins were required for the correct polar localization of the chemoreceptor McpG in R. sphaeroides. In E. coli, CheR binds to the NWETF motif on the high-abundance receptors, allowing methylation of both high- and low-abundance receptors. This motif is not contained on any R. sphaeroides chemoreceptors thus far identified, although 2 of the 13 putative chemoreceptors, McpA and TlpT, do have similar sequences. This suggests that CheR2 either interacts with the NWETF motif of E. coli methyl-accepting chemotaxis proteins (MCPs), even though its native motif may be slightly different, or with another conserved region of the MCPs. Methanol release measurements show that R. sphaeroides has an adaptation system that is different from that of Bacillus subtilis and E. coli, with methanol release measurable on the addition of attractant but not on its removal. Intriguingly, CheA2, but not CheA1, is able to phosphorylate CheB1, suggesting that signaling through CheA1 cannot initiate feedback receptor adaptation via CheB1-P.


* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Microbiology Unit, Department of Biochemistry, University of Oxford, South Parks Road, Oxford, OX1 3QU, United Kingdom. Phone: 44-1865-275299. Fax: 44-1865-275297. E-mail: armitage{at}bioch.ox.ac.uk.

dagger Present address: Department of Oral Biology, Dental School, University of Newcastle, Newcastle-upon-Tyne NE2 4BW, United Kingdom.


Journal of Bacteriology, December 2001, p. 7135-7144, Vol. 183, No. 24
0021-9193/01/$04.00+0   DOI: 10.1128/JB.183.24.7135-7144.2001
Copyright © 2001, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.



This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Martin, A. C., Gould, M., Byles, E., Roberts, M. A. J., Armitage, J. P. (2006). Two Chemosensory Operons of Rhodobacter sphaeroides Are Regulated Independently by Sigma 28 and Sigma 54. J. Bacteriol. 188: 7932-7940 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Porter, S. L., Wadhams, G. H., Martin, A. C., Byles, E. D., Lancaster, D. E., Armitage, J. P. (2006). The CheYs of Rhodobacter sphaeroides. J. Biol. Chem. 281: 32694-32704 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Stephens, B. B., Loar, S. N., Alexandre, G. (2006). Role of CheB and CheR in the Complex Chemotactic and Aerotactic Pathway of Azospirillum brasilense. J. Bacteriol. 188: 4759-4768 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Slovak, P. M., Porter, S. L., Armitage, J. P. (2006). Differential Localization of Mre Proteins with PBP2 in Rhodobacter sphaeroides.. J. Bacteriol. 188: 1691-1700 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Slovak, P. M., Wadhams, G. H., Armitage, J. P. (2005). Localization of MreB in Rhodobacter sphaeroides under Conditions Causing Changes in Cell Shape and Membrane Structure. J. Bacteriol. 187: 54-64 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Porter, S. L., Armitage, J. P. (2004). Chemotaxis in Rhodobacter sphaeroides Requires an Atypical Histidine Protein Kinase. J. Biol. Chem. 279: 54573-54580 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Szurmant, H., Ordal, G. W. (2004). Diversity in Chemotaxis Mechanisms among the Bacteria and Archaea. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 68: 301-319 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Martin, A. C., Nair, U., Armitage, J. P., Maddock, J. R. (2003). Polar Localization of CheA2 in Rhodobacter sphaeroides Requires Specific Che Homologs. J. Bacteriol. 185: 4667-4671 [Abstract] [Full Text]