This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sutton, M. D.
Right arrow Articles by Walker, G. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Sutton, M. D.
Right arrow Articles by Walker, G. C.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Journal of Bacteriology, May 2001, p. 2897-2909, Vol. 183, No. 9
0021-9193/01/$04.00+0   DOI: 10.1128/JB.183.9.2897-2909.2001
Copyright © 2001, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.

Genetic Interactions between the Escherichia coli umuDC Gene Products and the beta  Processivity Clamp of the Replicative DNA Polymerase

Mark D. Sutton, Mary F. Farrow, Briana M. Burton, and Graham C. Walker*

Biology Department, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139

Received 5 December 2000/Accepted 22 January 2001

The Escherichia coli umuDC gene products encode DNA polymerase V, which participates in both translesion DNA synthesis (TLS) and a DNA damage checkpoint control. These two temporally distinct roles of the umuDC gene products are regulated by RecA-single-stranded DNA-facilitated self-cleavage of UmuD (which participates in the checkpoint control) to yield UmuD' (which enables TLS). In addition, even modest overexpression of the umuDC gene products leads to a cold-sensitive growth phenotype, apparently due to the inappropriate expression of the DNA damage checkpoint control activity of UmuD2C. We have previously reported that overexpression of the varepsilon  proofreading subunit of DNA polymerase III suppresses umuDC-mediated cold sensitivity, suggesting that interaction of varepsilon  with UmuD2C is important for the DNA damage checkpoint control function of the umuDC gene products. Here, we report that overexpression of the beta  processivity clamp of the E. coli replicative DNA polymerase (encoded by the dnaN gene) not only exacerbates the cold sensitivity conferred by elevated levels of the umuDC gene products but, in addition, confers a severe cold-sensitive phenotype upon a strain expressing moderately elevated levels of the umuD'C gene products. Such a strain is not otherwise normally cold sensitive. To identify mutant beta  proteins possibly deficient for physical interactions with the umuDC gene products, we selected for novel dnaN alleles unable to confer a cold-sensitive growth phenotype upon a umuD'C-overexpressing strain. In all, we identified 75 dnaN alleles, 62 of which either reduced the expression of beta  or prematurely truncated its synthesis, while the remaining alleles defined eight unique missense mutations of dnaN. Each of the dnaN missense mutations retained at least a partial ability to function in chromosomal DNA replication in vivo. In addition, these eight dnaN alleles were also unable to exacerbate the cold sensitivity conferred by modestly elevated levels of the umuDC gene products, suggesting that the interactions between UmuD' and beta  are a subset of those between UmuD and beta . Taken together, these findings suggest that interaction of beta  with UmuD2C is important for the DNA damage checkpoint function of the umuDC gene products. Four possible models for how interactions of UmuD2C with the varepsilon  and the beta  subunits of DNA polymerase III might help to regulate DNA replication in response to DNA damage are discussed.


* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Biology Department, 68-633, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 77 Massachusetts Ave., Cambridge, MA 02139. Phone: (617) 253-6716. Fax: (617) 253-2643. E-mail: gwalker{at}MIT.EDU.


Journal of Bacteriology, May 2001, p. 2897-2909, Vol. 183, No. 9
0021-9193/01/$04.00+0   DOI: 10.1128/JB.183.9.2897-2909.2001
Copyright © 2001, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.



This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Beuning, P. J., Chan, S., Waters, L. S., Addepalli, H., Ollivierre, J. N., Walker, G. C. (2009). Characterization of Novel Alleles of the Escherichia coli umuDC Genes Identifies Additional Interaction Sites of UmuC with the Beta Clamp. J. Bacteriol. 191: 5910-5920 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Pohlhaus, J. R., Long, D. T., O'Reilly, E., Kreuzer, K. N. (2008). The {varepsilon} Subunit of DNA Polymerase III Is Involved in the Nalidixic Acid-Induced SOS Response in Escherichia coli. J. Bacteriol. 190: 5239-5247 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Maul, R. W., Sanders, L. H., Lim, J. B., Benitez, R., Sutton, M. D. (2007). Role of Escherichia coli DNA Polymerase I in Conferring Viability upon the dnaN159 Mutant Strain. J. Bacteriol. 189: 4688-4695 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Beuning, P. J., Simon, S. M., Zemla, A., Barsky, D., Walker, G. C. (2006). A Non-cleavable UmuD Variant That Acts as a UmuD' Mimic. J. Biol. Chem. 281: 9633-9640 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Maul, R. W., Sutton, M. D. (2005). Roles of the Escherichia coli RecA Protein and the Global SOS Response in Effecting DNA Polymerase Selection In Vivo. J. Bacteriol. 187: 7607-7618 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Sutton, M. D. (2004). The Escherichia coli dnaN159 Mutant Displays Altered DNA Polymerase Usage and Chronic SOS Induction. J. Bacteriol. 186: 6738-6748 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Sutton, M. D., Narumi, I., Walker, G. C. (2002). Posttranslational modification of the umuD-encoded subunit of Escherichia coli DNA polymerase V regulates its interactions with the beta processivity clamp. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 99: 5307-5312 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Sutton, M. D., Walker, G. C. (2001). Managing DNA polymerases: Coordinating DNA replication, DNA repair, and DNA recombination. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 98: 8342-8349 [Abstract] [Full Text]