JB
Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Smith, B. T.
Right arrow Articles by Walker, G. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Smith, B. T.
Right arrow Articles by Walker, G. C.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Journal of Bacteriology, January 2002, p. 488-493, Vol. 184, No. 2
0021-9193/01/$04.00+0     DOI: 10.1128/JB.184.2.488-493.2002
Copyright © 2002, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Localization of UvrA and Effect of DNA Damage on the Chromosome of Bacillus subtilis

Bradley T. Smith, Alan D. Grossman, and Graham C. Walker*

Department of Biology, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts

Received 6 September 2001/ Accepted 22 October 2001

We found that the nucleotide excision repair protein UvrA, which is involved in DNA damage recognition, localizes to the entire chromosome both before and after damage in living Bacillus subtilis cells. We suggest that the UvrA2B damage recognition complex is constantly scanning the genome, searching for lesions in the DNA. We also found that DNA damage induces a dramatic reconfiguration of the chromosome such that it no longer fills the entire cell as it does during normal growth. This reconfiguration is reversible after low doses of damage and is dependent on the damage-induced SOS response. We suggest that this reconfiguration of the chromosome after damage may be either a reflection of ongoing DNA repair or an active mechanism to protect the cell’s genome. Similar observations have been made in Escherichia coli, indicating that the alteration of chromosome structure after DNA damage may be a widespread phenomenon.


* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Department of Biology, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Room 68-633, 77 Massachusetts Ave., Cambridge, MA 02139. Phone: (617) 253-6716. Fax: (617) 253-2643. E-mail: gwalker{at}mit.edu.


Journal of Bacteriology, January 2002, p. 488-493, Vol. 184, No. 2
0021-9193/01/$04.00+0     DOI: 10.1128/JB.184.2.488-493.2002
Copyright © 2002, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.




This article has been cited by other articles:




Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
Appl. Environ. Microbiol. Infect. Immun. Eukaryot. Cell
Mol. Cell. Biol. J. Virol. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev.
ALL ASM JOURNALS

Copyright © 2002 by the American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.