JB
Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bansal, A. K.
Right arrow Articles by Meyer, T. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bansal, A. K.
Right arrow Articles by Meyer, T. E.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Journal of Bacteriology, April 2002, p. 2260-2272, Vol. 184, No. 8
0021-9193/02/$04.00+0     DOI: 10.1128/JB.184.8.2260-2272.2002
Copyright © 2002, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Evolutionary Analysis by Whole-Genome Comparisons

Arvind K. Bansal1 and Terrance E. Meyer2*

Department of Computer Science, Kent State University, Kent, Ohio 44242,1 Department of Biochemistry, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona 857212

Received 20 August 2001/ Accepted 11 January 2002

A total of 37 complete genome sequences of bacteria, archaea, and eukaryotes were compared. The percentage of orthologous genes of each species contained within any of the other 36 genomes was established. In addition, the mean identity of the orthologs was calculated. Several conclusions result: (i) a greater absolute number of orthologs of a given species is found in larger species than in smaller ones; (ii) a greater percentage of the orthologous genes of smaller genomes is contained in other species than is the case for larger genomes, which corresponds to a larger proportion of essential genes; (iii) before species can be specifically related to one another in terms of gene content, it is first necessary to correct for the size of the genome; (iv) eukaryotes have a significantly smaller percentage of bacterial orthologs after correction for genome size, which is consistent with their placement in a separate domain; (v) the archaebacteria are specifically related to one another but are not significantly different in gene content from the bacteria as a whole; (vi) determination of the mean identity of all orthologs (involving hundreds of gene comparisons per genome pair) reduces the impact of errors in misidentification of orthologs and to misalignments, and thus it is far more reliable than single gene comparisons; (vii) however, there is a maximum amount of change in protein sequences of 37% mean identity, which limits the use of percentage sequence identity to the lower taxa, a result which should also be true for single gene comparisons of both proteins and rRNA; (viii) most of the species that appear to be specifically related based upon gene content also appear to be specifically related based upon the mean identity of orthologs; (ix) the genes of a majority of species considered in this study have diverged too much to allow the construction of all-encompassing evolutionary trees. However, we have shown that eight species of gram-negative bacteria, six species of gram-positive bacteria, and eight species of archaebacteria are specifically related in terms of gene content, mean identity of orthologs, or both.


* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Department of Biochemistry, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721. Phone: (520) 621-5256. Fax: (520) 621-6603. E-mail: temeyer{at}u.Arizona.edu.


Journal of Bacteriology, April 2002, p. 2260-2272, Vol. 184, No. 8
0021-9193/02/$04.00+0     DOI: 10.1128/JB.184.8.2260-2272.2002
Copyright © 2002, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.




This article has been cited by other articles:




Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
Appl. Environ. Microbiol. Infect. Immun. Eukaryot. Cell
Mol. Cell. Biol. J. Virol. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev.
ALL ASM JOURNALS

Copyright © 2002 by the American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.